Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think Luke knows the Panthers are planning to move on from Cam


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

I think this kind of stuff played into his decision, going by some of the language he used in his goodbye video.  There is alot of change going on around the organization, but at this point he lost the only head coach he's ever known in the NFL and he's getting ready to lose his quarterback on top of the other changes.  I think that's why his language was more about "I'm taking this opportunity to leave."

Agreed. I think the core reason for his retirement was probably health issues, but current circumstances made this a logical time to call it a career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

IS this a tread speculating on a players speculation that a certain player wont be on the team and thats why he retired? well if this isnt a new low as of luke's retirement.

How is this low? The talk of moving on from Cam has been going on all season? 
 

If Tepper told Luke that he is planning to rebuild and part of that plan is going to require moving on from certain players that he has been teammates with his entire career on top of the fact that his only professional head coach was already fired, I am sure weighed heavily into his decision to hang it up.

I would think most logical fans can see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Luke's retirement had nothing to do with Cam and everything to do with his own health.  Thats what he said, and I think we should take it at face value.  No reason not to.

You’re telling me that if we had made the playoffs and looked poised to make a run this season he would have still retired?

Would Peppers have come back for one last season if he was told were rebuilding instead of trying to make a run at a championship?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpeedOFLight said:

If Cam is healthy, it will be a huge mistake to let him go. Picking up is option I believe will be around 19 million which is “peanuts” this day in age for QBs. It would be silly to get rid of him and sign a journey man vet. I will get this out of the way, the Panthers will not “go all in” to to get Burrows. Cincy is going to keep that pick. Now Burrows May be a great QB in the pros but I can name a lot of QBs who was killing it in college only to disappear at the pro level. Does anyone remember Colt Brennan? He is the guy that Burrows has broken his record. Where is he? All I’m saying is that if Cam is healthy. You roll with him and see how next year pans out. I noticed a lot of people saying that we should tank next year for Lawrence but why? Waste a season to get a guy who maybe will be good or bad at the pro level? We need to play to win each season. Anything less is unacceptable. Time is something you can’t get back so I don’t believe in ways believe in wasting opportunities. Now if it is proven that Cam is not healthy, we have a whole new ball game but we will see. I want to see him in this new system if possible . Keep pounding!

Colt Brennan played at Hawaii, in a gimmick offense that threw the ball 70 times a game.  A little different than going 15-0 in the SEC and winning the Natty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the problem. Tepper's ego wants to issue in a new wave of doing things in the NFL. He wants to be responsible for it. Tepper wants nothing from Ron's teams outside of McCaffrey. Now if some reason we dump McCaffrey, i'm done as a fan. I doubt that'll happen though. But seriously, let the contracts run out and FFS KEEP HURNEY AWAY FROM BRADBERRY.

Also, cut Jackson he sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He clearly stated that he can't play the game the way he was taught to play it.

We all remember the way he looked being carted off of the field after that one concussion.

We all remember losing Michael Oher in the preseason to a concussion and then watching our OTs get spun around the entire season after the Super Bowl run.

Let's not try and devalue the risk to Luke's health and imply that he's quitting because of one person. That's an insult to the competitor he was. The same could be said of Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m absolutely sure that if Luke felt better could still play at the level he wants to and be able to life a quality life after the game he would play— probably ask to be traded to a contender but he would play.

its a violent game and is about as destructive to someone’s health as smoking and drinking all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Snake said:

What the huggers can't get through there head is that JR left this team in a mess. All our marquee players are above the age of 28 except CMC and he's not enough to win. JR insured this rebuild has to happen. 

Yes, because JR hand picked the players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...