-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
I said before if we had Fields in 2022 we probably go to the playoffs with him and Wilks This running game + Fields in the back field would be legit. Add in his ability to throw a nice deep ball and it could work well with what Canales wants to do -
I agree he's young enough and he has the prerequisite traits and talent you need to try to shape a franchise QB out of him. The issue is I'm just not sold this is the place to fix him. Until proven otherwise I'm not seeing Canales as the QB whisperer of sorts that he was billed as when we hired him. He had input along with Morgan on this QB room in the offseason. They chose to back themselves into this corner. And we currently sit 29th in the league in passing yards per game and 28th in points per game. For comparison sake: 2023: Passing yards per game - 161.2 Points per game - 13.9 2024: Passing yards per game - 170.7 Points per game - 16.7 For all the talk about how bad Reich and his staff were that's really not encouraging. To have invested what we did in the offensive line in one offseason we really need to see better results than this through the remainder of the season under Canales. -
By Ghostofdelhomme · Posted
Justin Fields is the exact opposite of what Canales is looking for, getting the ball out quickly to “playmakers”. However, if said playmakers are non-existent, then a wingback offense circa 1920s may be his best option
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.