Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Tepper: "Sometimes you have to tear things down to build them up"


bobowilson

Recommended Posts

Great Tepper...

 

But if you feel the need to tear the whole poo down.. Please do not let the same clown build the new house as the one you just teared down.

If we trade Newton and blame it on the "start over from scratch" then you better now have Hurney on the payrole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the article where tepper talks about 'i hear this team has an owner with some resources' is one of the worst, most cringe worthy things i've ever read when it comes to football. spending money on a fuging sports science facility and new team headquarters (except those are actually taxpayer dollars lol) doesn't mean poo if you have a GM who sucks and hire a college coach who can't even win a conference championship and has no specialty on either side of the ball.

are people really buying into this poo? seriously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Zithers2 said:

the article where tepper talks about 'i hear this team has an owner with some resources' is one of the worst, most cringe worthy things i've ever read when it comes to football. spending money on a fuging sports science facility and new team headquarters (except those are actually taxpayer dollars lol) doesn't mean poo if you have a GM who sucks and hire a college coach who can't even win a conference championship and has no specialty on either side of the ball.

are people really buying into this poo? seriously?

Remember when Chip Kelly tried to do the Sports Science thing?

Pederson got rid of it and then they won a Super Bowl

https://www.oregonlive.com/nfl/2016/07/chip_kellys_sport_science_has.html

Quote

 

"A lot of that stuff has been cut way back," Pederson told reporters during the Eagles mini-camp. "I think it was introduced, and now, great, it was introduced. Now let's pull back on it.

Kelly and his staff implemented a number of changes to the Eagles training regimen, including players wearing GPS systems to track their conditioning, acceleration, fatigue and stress while also giving coaches information to determine when athletes are physically ready to handle more training.

Kelly also used an unusual practice schedule, such as practicing on Tuesdays, traditionally a day off. He reportedly had players wear monitors while sleeping. Kelly's methods left some players unhappy and reportedly created a rift in the locker room.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shufdog said:

Seems like just a couple of weeks ago the majority here wanted this whole thing blown up? Now that it appears it might just be happening, people seem to be backing down from that notion.

if you're going to blow it up, you blow it all up.

cam/luke/shaq/bradberry...

you keep cmc while he is on his rookie deal and part ways when he's a free agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bobsfoodbasics said:

 

you keep cmc while he is on his rookie deal and part ways when he's a free agent.

Why though?

CMC just makes sure you win a few games you're not trying to win, and kills your ability to draft high enough for Lawrence or Fields.  By the time you're in contention CMC is ancient in RB years and breaking down, and he's only hurt your draft position.

If you're going to be bad, you might as well go full Hinkie 76ers.

If we're truly tearing it down, I would trade everyone including CMC for draft picks and aim for 0-16.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that sometimes you have to cut ties with some bad contracts, and that can set you back a year or so.  But that's about it.  The rest of the old school way of "a long, full scale rebuild" is fools gold and outdated in today's NFL (salary cap era).  The truth is that the expectation should be to start winning by the end of the 2nd season and no later than the 3rd.  For teams who had losing seasons the first 2 years of a coaches tenure, very few were rewarded by giving him a 3rd season (Vermiel, Shanahan, Rivera come to mind).  Of those few that were losing in the 3rd season, pretty much no team was rewarded for giving the coach a 4th year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bobsfoodbasics said:

if you're going to blow it up, you blow it all up.

cam/luke/shaq/bradberry...

you keep cmc while he is on his rookie deal and part ways when he's a free agent.

But you want fans in the stands, right? What are you gonna do? Sell tickets to draft day every year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Why though?

CMC just makes sure you win a few games you're not trying to win, and kills your ability to draft high enough for Lawrence or Fields.  By the time you're in contention CMC is ancient in RB years and breaking down, and he's only hurt your draft position.

If you're going to be bad, you might as well go full Hinkie 76ers.

If we're truly tearing it down, I would trade everyone including CMC for draft picks and aim for 0-16.

 

i agree with that somewhat.

I don't think you can go full 76ers hinke in the nfl. sure 0-16 gets you trevor lawrence, but it gets you absolutely no crowds at the stadium and it kills all of the panthers marketing and ad partnerships.

the nba pretty much forced out hinke for ruining their image, even though he had the right idea. the nfl owners are even more protective of their on field product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • btw, mingo supposed to play tonight.  we want Cowboys to lose for more than one reason, but they are imploding and their 4th round pick is ours. Rams started rough this year, we have their second rounder, and for a while it a in the top 10 picks.  they are going the opposite direction of the Cowboys.  I do think they have Kansas City after us, so that will help
    • You go after my guy with nonsense like "I don't see quickness or explosiveness" and "I haven't seen a lot of quickness or full route tree ability that we always ignore" Then yea, I'm gonna punch back. Like I've said, if people want to draft someone else, that's totally fine, everyone has their own opinions.  But if you're going to advocate against a specific player, don't talk complete nonsense about their game like this. Even more so, don't do that when you're saying I'm the one with a bias towards him. If I was afraid of it looking like a bias pick on my part, I'd never have said I was an Arizona alumni when arguing for him, but I've admitted it from the very beginning, because I don't think my Arizona connection gives me a bias, it just means I know his game REALLY well as I've seen every snap of his college career.  So yea, you start saying the knocks on him are things that he's actually really good at, then you're going to get an earful from me with some video evidence to back it up. In the end, for me, it all falls back to how rare a player like T-Mac can be due to his size.  The smaller speedier type of WRs are exactly who you can find in later rounds and who become available as Free Agents, I can't ever get on board with taking a Hunter (as a WR) or Burden over T-Mac if all were on the board, for that reason alone, and I'd say that if he was a freaking Sun Devil, no matter how much it would hurt me to admit if it if that were the case.
    • Carolina Reapers.. a team so bad if you lose to us somebody's job dies..   😆 
×
×
  • Create New...