Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Staff Tracker

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KDawg004 Rookie

KDawg004

Posted
Posted

I can get onboard with Sean Ryan. Joe Brady would definitely be my number 1 choice.

Phil Snow can tag along as long as he’s not the DC. Give him one of the assistant jobs. If we’re really switching back to a 4-3, George Edwards, Joe Woods, and to a lesser extent Kris Richard are guys I would be looking at.

If we want to go the ex-HC mentor route then Wade Phillips (3-4), Rod Marinelli (4-3), and Marvin Lewis (4-3) are options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PurityControl Newbie

PurityControl

Posted
Posted

Yeah Phil Snow makes my dick soft..... 

Got to believe if the guy was a legit defensive mind he would have found his way to the NFL already and had even minor success.

Bring him out of loyalty get him a nice paycheck find something "important" for him to do, but giving him the keys to the defense 

 

 

 

stop it the expanse GIF by SYFY

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That actually brings up another question...

In the NFL, not only do you have to cut underperforming players. You also sometimes have to fire underachieving coaches.

if Rhule faces one of those situations, it'll be interesting to see whether he can handle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That actually brings up another question...

In the NFL, not only do you have to cut underperforming players. You also sometimes have to fire underachieving coaches.

if Rhule faces one of those situations, it'll be interesting to see whether he can handle it.

Has he ever fired any coaching staff at Baylor or Temple?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Found something, and it might not go over too well...

That...could be a problem.

Well, it does give us this to fall back on:

If we get a few years down the road and things are not going well, if he pulls a Sean Mcvay and fires a dude who wasn’t obviously incompetent, it would be a canary in the coal mine he’s full of it. But that’s a purely hypothetical negative situation. Hopefully it will never come up.

But if I were a local reporter that answer would prompt me ask several pointed questions about how he designs his hiring proces to ensure firing isn’t necessary. Because if you don’t believe in firing, you better be damn sure the people you hire are capable of doing the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Well, it does give us this to fall back on:

If we get a few years down the road and things are not going well, if he pulls a Sean Mcvay and fires a dude who wasn’t obviously incompetent, it would be a canary in the coal mine he’s full of it. But that’s a purely hypothetical negative situation. Hopefully it will never come up.

But if I were a local reporter that answer would prompt me ask several pointed questions about how he designs his hiring proces to ensure firing isn’t necessary. Because if you don’t believe in firing, you better be damn sure the people you hire are capable of doing the job.

David Tepper obviously doesn't have a problem firing people.

But then how would that look? And would it make Rhule angry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

David Tepper obviously doesn't have a problem firing people.

But then how would that look? And would it make Rhule angry?

Yeah I think that gets sticky in a hurry. I don’t think owners should be telling coaches they need to fire x member of their staff unless for non football reasons. 

Thats a Dan Snyder type move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Found something, and it might not go over too well...

That...could be a problem.

He may have to learn the hard way. Ron also felt that way too, he did fire a couple of guys. A lot guys feel this ways til its "either you fire ______ or I fire you"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Veteran

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

Rhule is going to have a lot and I mean a lot leeway here when it comes to winning and such. This is a long haul move, looking 4 to 5 plus years down the road. Firing coaches is probably not going to be necessary for him. 

If it works, it will work...if it doesn't, it will probably look really bad because I've got a feeling a massive tear down is going to take place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Rhule is going to have a lot and I mean a lot leeway here when it comes to winning and such. This is a long haul move, looking 4 to 5 plus years down the road. Firing coaches is probably not going to be necessary for him. 

If it works, it will work...if it doesn't, it will probably look really bad because I've got a feeling a massive tear down is going to take place. 

How many first time NFL head coaches get their staff completely right, though?

If, for example, we had an OC that was performing like Shula but Rhule refuses to fire him... Well, we've seen that movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...