Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule is not into analytics, and his offensive philosophy is archaic and inefficient


bobowilson

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

49ers and Ravens and Packers and Vikings and Seattle all run the ball and run it well

they are all in the hunt for a Super Bowl 

This is what typically wins when it matters the most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule does have a lot more in common with old coaches than some are going to want acknowledge. 

Ball control.  Playing to your D.  Etc. 

I’m still baffled a dude that went 0-11 vs the top 25 was just given such a sweet deal and was the college hire....and his offenses at Baylor were nothing spectacular.   And we made him the 6th highest paid coach 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Something I'm keeping in the back of my mind...

They asked Sean Payton about him, and Payton mentioned that Rhule is friends with Saints assistant GM Jeff Ireland (both went to Baylor).

Rhule didn't go to Baylor, he only coached there.

Rhule played for Joe Paterno at Penn State.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobowilson said:

There seems to be a perception Rhule is an analytics guy, but this couldn't be further from the truth.  He's actually pretty similar to Rivera, in that he's conservative, obsessed with running the ball, and playing for 'field position'.

Anyone who watched their Bowl game last week will remember he punted on 4th and 1 at midfield when he was down by 2 touchdowns.  There's a lot more to analytics than 4th down decisions, but these kind of conservative decisions demonstrate a lack of awareness.  And in fact, he punts on 4th down quite a bit (and even when you hear him discuss his decison making, it's always best on some gut feeling he had, rather than numbers).

He could still be a successful coach.   Perhaps he'a adaptable and will embrace analytics if someone teaches him.  But he's going to need coordinators who are lot brighter and more innovative than he is, as his main selling point seems to be his leadership abilities and not anything tactical.  

There has to be something Tepper heard from Rhule that we're not aware of, but as of now, it's a mystery.

 

 

How did you become such a confident expert on this coach in such a small period of time?  Amazing, unless you were just cherry picking a perspective and cutting an pasting the links, but I don't get that vibe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Did you read the interview Rhule gave that is contained in the twitter links in the original post?

 

I've done more that that. 

Not my problem you think running the ball is archaic,  and haven't bothered to actually listen to the man's ideology beyond a couple of tweets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Cite any examples of Rhule incorporating analytics at Temple or Baylor (as a coach, not recruiting)

I'll wait....

 

My statement that you have no idea of this man's philosophy at football, stands. 

You haven't disproved, and you can't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

Cite any examples of Rhule incorporating analytics at Temple or Baylor (as a coach, not recruiting)

I'll wait....

 

. At Baylor, he had a program and staff that was focused on using sports science and player development to help the team’s performance. The Applied Performance Department used data and other research to help all athletes at Baylor perform to the best of their ability. There’s no doubt that Rhule’s desire to build a similar type of group with the Panthers aligned with Tepper’s vision.

Scott Fowler, The Charlotte Observer: Matt Rhule isn’t an ‘offensive genius.’ He’s a fixer, and the Panthers need fixing

This was in Scott's thread of Rhule links. I didn't even have to leave the board to find it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thielen, Chark, Hurst, Miles, and then Dionte as the answers to a pitiful group of offensive skill players horrifically backfired.  I want to see that 4.3 speed Thomkins playing over David Moore   
    • And btw, you have to remember that T-Mac is doing all this with pretty poor QB play this year, on a team that's a mess with no other quality offensive weapons to take attention away from him.   Yet he's still 3rd in the nation in receiving yards with defenses knowing he's our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd option on every passing play.  He still gets open at all 3 levels and when he can't get open because of the double and triple coverage, he consistently makes crazy contested catches that those 6' WRs that are a little more explosive and fast, just can't make. If he was on one of those elite college teams, with a great QB and multiple elite WR and RB options to take attention and give T-Mac single coverage on every play, he'd be putting up bonkers video game like numbers. He's the straight up full package, if we don't end up with him, 5 years from now everyone here is going to look back and say, "yep, he was right about this guy"
    • btw, mingo supposed to play tonight.  we want Cowboys to lose for more than one reason, but they are imploding and their 4th round pick is ours. Rams started rough this year, we have their second rounder, and for a while it a in the top 10 picks.  they are going the opposite direction of the Cowboys.  I do think they have Kansas City after us, so that will help
×
×
  • Create New...