The Patriots need to move on from Tom Brady and trade for Cam Newton

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Someone losing their poo will forever be known in the Huddle as a "Chuckdown."

Not an UpChuck?

[Forty-Eight]

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Someone losing their poo will forever be known in the Huddle as a "Chuckdown."

That’s hilarious clinton 

[joemac]

1 minute ago, carpanfan96 said:

When it came up the Panthers were looking to trade him, NFL FO poll had him worth a 2nd to 3rd round pick. 

 

Main reason I think he stays, his injuries have completely tanked his trade value.  

If Cam is healthy, hes worth AT LEAST a first round draft pick.  The thing is though, if hes healthy then there is no reason to trade him.

[therealmjl]

19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Chuck trying hard to have his Forty-Nine account activated. What has you on tilt today?

he's running around throwing another tantrum because he is once again wrong about literally everything ever

[rayzor]

2 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

Yeah prove it!

Which one, that you're Chuck (that would mean posting a list of bunch of banned alt accounts, most of them with the name Chuck in them, associated with the IP addresses you are using)?

Or that you sent mr. Scot a  message calling him a cute new name you dreamed up all on your own and I'm guessing blaming him for that thread you had locked down?

So which one do you want proven?

[Forty-Eight]

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not an UpChuck?

Not a ScotOma?

[Forty-Eight]

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Which one, that you're Chuck (that would mean posting a list of bunch of banned alt accounts, most of them with the name Chuck in them, associated with the IP addresses you are using)?

Or that you sent mr. Scot a  message calling him a cute new name you dreamed up all on your own and I'm guessing blaming him for that thread you had locked down?

So which one do you want proven?

Which ever one you want. You told me to give you a min. I gave you more than a minute

[joemac]

Just now, Forty-Eight said:

Not a ScotOma?

You're not very good at this, are you?

[Forty-Eight]

4 minutes ago, mjligon said:

he's running around throwing another tantrum because he is once again wrong about literally everything ever

You’re wrong

[Forty-Eight]

Just now, joemac said:

You're not very good at this, are you?

Don’t even get involved lil buddy

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, joemac said:

You're not very good at this, are you?

Good at sh-tting up your thread. Shame that happened.

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

Just now, Forty-Eight said:

You’re wrong

[BrianS]

5 minutes ago, joemac said:

Ok so thats 2790 compared to 3000.  So we throw in a 2nd next year too then?

Now you're saying that one completely unproven, unknown rookie is worth four?  That's not helping.  Would you rather roll the dice four times or once?  I'd rather roll four, and I think most others would as well.  The history of the draft is littered with "sure fire" high picks that utterly fell on their faces for one reason or another.

I don't think there is any pick slot that I'd give up multiple high round (1-3) picks to get to.  Would I throw in a 4-7 rounder to move up a few spots?  Sure, probably, the odds go way down there.

Remember, this is the sort of thinking that Tepper wants to see used more often going forward.  Analytics and statistics.  

[Shufdog]

5 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Which one, that you're Chuck (that would mean posting a list of bunch of banned alt accounts, most of them with the name Chuck in them, associated with the IP addresses you are using)?

Or that you sent mr. Scot a  message calling him a cute new name you dreamed up all on your own and I'm guessing blaming him for that thread you had locked down?

So which one do you want proven?

Wait, are you saying mods can see PM's between members?