Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vegas thinks there's a decent chance that Tom Brady is our QB next year


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Favored to stay in New England, but here are the odds for him playing for someone else:

Cleveland: 11/2

Carolina: 6/1

Las Vegas: 6/1

Dallas: 7/1

Indianapolis: 7/1

Chargers: 7/1

Tampa Bay: 9/1

Very interesting. Apparently SOMEONE out there is betting a fair amount of money this will happen or else the odds wouldn't be that relatively high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Remind me why people are opposed to having Tom Brady throw to Christian McCaffrey again? This is assuming Cam no longer wants to play here. The better option would be...?

Exactly what I'm thinking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Remind me why people are opposed to having Tom Brady throw to Christian McCaffrey again? This is assuming Cam no longer wants to play here. The better option would be...?

Im not sure, but straight up, I would be rooting for Brady as hard as I possibly can if he happens to be our starting QB next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady took pay cuts for rings in NE.  He is not loyal to McD.  He stays in NE --- they will offer him a 2-3 year deal and he will take it or retire.

It never bodes well for a QB to go elsewhere at the end of the career, especially after they should retire. 

This does suggest that Vegas thinks Cleveland is the front runner for MxDaniels, however, because this betting line is based on the Brady/McD connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know Brady is a douche but we currently have 2 terrible young QBs on our roster and one that is a star when healthy but that is up in the air. somebody please tell me how having the greatest QB ever would be a bad thing? especially one that gets the ball out quickly which neutralizes having a weak OLine and also allows playmakers to get out in space, which we have 3 really good ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...