Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stefanski to interview

Cavscout

By Cavscout,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

bobowilson Newbie

bobowilson

Posted
Posted

I've been telling you guys Stefanski is Tepper's target and that Jourdan Rodrigue didn't have good sources to Tepper

If you understand Big Tep, Stefanski is the only guy from the list that makes any sense in what he's looking for

All Panthers fans should be extremely excited by a possible Stefanski hire, but he's in extremely high demand right now.  If the Vikings lose to the Saints tomorrow, their ownership will highly consider firing Zimmer and elevating Stefanski to head coach (not to mention Cleveland).

So hope for the Vikings to win tomorrow.  Stefanski has high potential to be the next great coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

I've been telling you guys Stefanski is Tepper's target and that Jourdan Rodrigue didn't have good sources to Tepper

If you understand Big Tep, Stefanski is the only guy from the list that makes any sense in what he's looking for

All Panthers fans should be extremely excited by a possible Stefanski hire, but he's in extremely high demand right now.  If the Vikings lose to the Saints tomorrow, their ownership will highly consider firing Zimmer and elevating Stefanski to head coach (not to mention Cleveland).

So hope for the Vikings to win tomorrow.  Stefanski has high potential to be the next great coach

Interesting take--makes sense.  I wanted him early then he seemed to fly off the radar. 

With Cook in and out of the lineup and Cousins' limitations, he has done a great job with that O.  I am not as sold as you are, but I see it.  Earlier in another thread I suggested that the Panthers seemed to be in wait mode--no sense of urgency.  McDaniels or Stef could be the reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobowilson Newbie

bobowilson

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Interesting take--makes sense.  I wanted him early then he seemed to fly off the radar. 

I made a thread about why Tepper would hire the Ivy league educated Stefanski a month ago, before he was even rumored to be linked with us in any way.

McCarthy/Bien/McDaniels/Rhule are not Tepper guys;  he's looking for a brilliant, analytical mind.   Stefanski is our guy if he takes our offer.

 

 

see:

David Tepper was famously known for only hiring Ivy League graduates at Appaloosa Management

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Stefanski is basically this year's version of the "next Sean McVay" model that everybody was going after last year.

All those guys flopped.

He might be different, but he's got less high level experience than most of the other candidates (except maybe Bieniemy, I'd have to look) so I'm not sure how seriously to take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Him or Bieniemy. I'd be happy with either of those 

I keep going back and forth.  They all have names that are hard to spell (Damn you for leaving us, John Fox) and that counts for something.

2 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

I made a thread about why Tepper would hire the Ivy league educated Stefanski a month ago, before he was even rumored to be linked with us in any way.

McCarthy/Bien/McDaniels/Rhule are not Tepper guys;  he's looking for a brilliant, analytical mind.   Stefanski is our guy if he takes our offer.

 

 

see:

David Tepper was famously known for only hiring Ivy League graduates at Appaloosa Management

 

You are making a strong argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobowilson Newbie

bobowilson

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I keep going back and forth.  They all have names that are hard to spell (Damn you for leaving us, John Fox) and that counts for something. 

I would

You are making a strong argument.

Tepper has been all about elevating the best and brightest his entire life.  The guys he hires at Appaloosa are some of the most intelligent graduates in the entire country.

But now all of a sudden, faced with his biggest decision, he's going to hire a running backs coach who has never proven his cognitive merit, because he's a "leader of men" and laminates Andy Reid's playbook.   Not a chance.

No, he wants Stefanski, the coordinator with the highest IQ in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I keep going back and forth.  They all have names that are hard to spell (Damn you for leaving us, John Fox) and that counts for something.

You are making a strong argument.

I can totally see that for his hedge fund, but the NFL is not high finance, and the Ivy Leagues are not known for their strong football programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. Scot
      Some love for Steve Wilks

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
    • LinvilleGorge
      Thanksgiving Games

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Clearly the best outcome for us is a Giants W. A spot or two difference in the 4th round is inconsequential. Just look at the trade value charts. A spot or two at the top of the 1st means a LOT. A spot or two in the mid-rounds? Virtually nothing.
    • UnluckyforSome
      Thanksgiving Games

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Agree. I don't think I have ever heard him say anything positive, at any time, about the Panthers. Best expectation is no mention at all.
×
×
  • Create New...