Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tua returning?


Panthercougar68

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Look, we wouldn't get Tua anyhow.  Either the Dolphins or Chargers would sang him first.  Honesly, I think he's damaged goods.  He'd be a younger version of Cam and without an improved OL to protect him either.

That’s the issue. That leaves the Chargers or Miami taking a non QB position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I have heard rumblings that he might but I think this hurts the Panthers because it’s 1 less qb taken before 7.

Thoughts?

Why would we want to take Tua anyway? His is injury prone at Alabama with less arm strength, mobility, and expeirence than the QB we already have. 

Suck in 2020 for Fields or Lawrence. Point. Blank. Period. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

That would also mean one of those two teams would likely take Herbert so Hurney wouldn't get any bright ideas.  I think he's VERY overrated.

I like Herbert and believe that with a Head Coach/QB Coach like Mike McCarthy he would be similar to Lawrence at this level. Hell, put Herbert at Clemson and Lawrence at Oregon and you'd probably have the same results as the teams already had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I like Herbert and believe that with a Head Coach/QB Coach like Mike McCarthy he would be similar to Lawrence at this level. Hell, put Herbert at Clemson and Lawrence at Oregon and you'd probably have the same results as the teams already had. 

Don't let a Tigers fan see this blasphemy!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FYI (I don't think you are too far off base)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely want a guy you can count on for a few games who gives the team a chance to win--I see that perspective.  My view is the backup needs to be competing and developing for 3 years from now, when Bryce may be a mediocre QB asking for $80m.  In addition, his success has been a relatively short stretch; we don't know if old Bryce might return.  I would like to be grooming a backup to be an NFL starter (here or elsewhere) than keeping a guy out of retirement.   But there is benefit to any approach, and what I like probably matters little--Cousins behind RGIII, Brady was drafted when Bledsoe was a big name, The Niners drafted Purdy when they were grooming Lance, etc.  If you sign a 38-year old veteran, you don't develop the backup QB.  Here, we seem to be able to develop QBs (Coach has the rep for developing QBs), so I would like to see us prepare for an uncertain future and use the talents we have on the staff.
    • Bryce is a young qb who can benefit from veteran mind in the room. Given the holes in the roster and needs it seems odd to put draft capital in to qb this year.
    • This doesn't have nearly the same appeal it used to. Teams are actively avoiding "Hard Knocks," especially after the Giants' experience. That said, I would enjoy it a lot.
×
×
  • Create New...