Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

But everyone said Cam was going to Chicago


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Who's everyone?  I've only seen two people suggest that.  That's not everyone.

Posters tend to exaggerate.  5 people posting that Cam will be gone = the board and fanbase hate Cam and want him gone. 

Whether he stays or goes largely depends on our assessment of his health.  That hasn't changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Posters tend to exaggerate.  5 people posting that Cam will be gone = the board and fanbase hate Cam and want him gone. 

Whether he stays or goes largely depends on our assessment of his health.  That hasn't changed.

And who the new HC is.  If it's a guy that runs an offense that is timing based and relies on accuracy where the QB stays in the pocket, then we likely move on from even a healthy Cam.  However, if it's a guy that can innovate and knows how to utilize a weapon like Cam, then he likely stays, if healthy.

One point I will make that I see a lot.  I am not sure Cam will be unwilling to play out his final year here.  I'm sure he'd prefer an extension, but he likely understands that wherever he goes, he's probably going to have a prove-it year.  Even if we traded him and he signs an extension with his new team, that contract would likely have an out for the team if his health doesn't hold up.  Nobody knows what his health is going to be, especially how it will hold up over the course of the season.  So, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he plays out the year knowing that he could maximize his value by showing that he can stay healthy.  After all, a healthy Cam will bring a MUCH higher price tag than one with serious questions about his long-term health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Woodie said:

And who the new HC is.  If it's a guy that runs an offense that is timing based and relies on accuracy where the QB stays in the pocket, then we likely move on from even a healthy Cam.  However, if it's a guy that can innovate and knows how to utilize a weapon like Cam, then he likely stays, if healthy.

One point I will make that I see a lot.  I am not sure Cam will be unwilling to play out his final year here.  I'm sure he'd prefer an extension, but he likely understands that wherever he goes, he's probably going to have a prove-it year.  Even if we traded him and he signs an extension with his new team, that contract would likely have an out for the team if his health doesn't hold up.  Nobody knows what his health is going to be, especially how it will hold up over the course of the season.  So, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he plays out the year knowing that he could maximize his value by showing that he can stay healthy.  After all, a healthy Cam will bring a MUCH higher price tag than one with serious questions about his long-term health.

A good coach will adjust his system to the abilities of the offense that he has.  If the coach can't do that, then we probably shouldn't hire him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

A good coach will adjust his system to the abilities of the offense that he has.  If the coach can't do that, then we probably shouldn't hire him.  

To a point, but most coaches have a fundamental philosophy that they will not deviate too far from.  They may adjust what they do, but most aren't going to complete overhaul it. 

But more to the point in this case, Cam is 30 years old, and coming off some significant injuries.  And he has a very specific style he plays with.  It doesn't fit all offenses, and not every coach wants to run that kind of offense.  So I can easily see why a new coach may want to bring someone in that better fits what they want to do and whom they have more confidence in their long-term health.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mc52:  But it helps my hazardously low self-esteem if I feel right and make others feel wrong.  Gosh.

 

When there is change afoot, people speculate--there is probably no better place to do that than on a discussion board.  Only a yet-to-be-weaned twit would keep score and weaponize everyone's conjecture. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I hear you, but it's still somewhat disappointing because this wasn't a huge issue when he was at South Carolina. He needs to put in the work to improve.
    • Seems about right. Legette has dropped a few and failed to catch some he could've caught but they really don't count contested catches as "drops". A drop is a ball you'd expect some random dude out of the stands to catch. Open and right on the hands. I vocally did not want Legette in the draft and I've honestly been pleasantly surprised so far. I wanted Ladd McConkey and still think he should've been the pick. I do think Legette has a higher ceiling though.
    • I honestly think that there should be separate MVP awards for qb vs every other position.  The QB is always the MVP on any good team these days.  Its a lot harder to win with a backup qb than with a back up RB or DE.  
×
×
  • Create New...