Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there a single coach that a huge chunk of fans won't be upset with if we hire?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I haven't seen any huge objections to Greg Roman.

While I wont revolt to the idea, greg roman did stagnate in san Fran and was pretty much the reason harbaugh was let go because he refused to let roman go.  Lamar is having a season like Kaepernick to start and while lamar is better, it is very possible once someone figures out the scheme, jackson will turn back into a pumpkin.  Reminds me of marty schottenheimer and jim mora, scheme is unstoppable in the short term to start, then adjustments are made by opponents and the scheme is extremely stoppable.  Just my opinion on the matter though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of the box idea here....

With Tom Brady possibly leaving New England and Tepper being the wealthiest owner in the league, do you think there’s any amount of money Tepper could throw at Bill Belichick to coach here? 

flame away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carolina Cajun said:

While I wont revolt to the idea, greg roman did stagnate in san Fran and was pretty much the reason harbaugh was let go because he refused to let roman go.  Lamar is having a season like Kaepernick to start and while lamar is better, it is very possible once someone figures out the scheme, jackson will turn back into a pumpkin.  Reminds me of marty schottenheimer and jim mora, scheme is unstoppable in the short term to start, then adjustments are made by opponents and the scheme is extremely stoppable.  Just my opinion on the matter though.

That’s as good as any objection. If you were to want sour me on Roman this is the post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...