Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We went to the trouble of firing Ron Rivera with 4 games left to get a jump start on interviews and it only yielded Mike McCarthy?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

It sure looks like he's going to be the only guy we interview before the regular season concludes and it's a free-for-all for all teams out of the playoffs. I'm confused as to why we went the dramatic route of firing Rivera so far before the end of the regular season if the only guy we were trying to beat other teams to was Mike McCarthy. Any explanation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that would be college coaches and the unemployed. I wonder what it says about the organization that the leaks are coming around guys that have agents and no jobs only. I would think there would be more noise than this but it's mostly coming from the guy who is screaming for another chance.

In all seriousness, i have no idea what the hell is going on and I am a little unsettled by the less attractive possibilities but Im holding in there still. So far, it's been a less then inspiring process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

It sure looks like he's going to be the only guy we interview before the regular season concludes and it's a free-for-all for all teams out of the playoffs. I'm confused as to why we went the dramatic route of firing Rivera so far before the end of the regular season if the only guy we were trying to beat other teams to was Mike McCarthy. Any explanation?

I think it's quite possible that he has spoken to other candidates but those havent been formal interviews. Remember that bowl season in college is still going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

It sure looks like he's going to be the only guy we interview before the regular season concludes and it's a free-for-all for all teams out of the playoffs. I'm confused as to why we went the dramatic route of firing Rivera so far before the end of the regular season if the only guy we were trying to beat other teams to was Mike McCarthy. Any explanation?

Don't forget that Rivera was not the only change. He also moved Ron Turner out so he could look at Scott in the OC role. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

It sure looks like he's going to be the only guy we interview before the regular season concludes and it's a free-for-all for all teams out of the playoffs. 

So? They didn't fire Rivera early just to do interviews. There is much more involved in a coaching search. They have likely talked to multiple agents as well but haven't done formal interviews. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As already stated, Tepper didn't want to lay the ground work for potential candidates behind Ron's back.  Ron being fired was a 100% given, but Tepper said it was about respecting the man enough not to be replacing him behind his back.   Inevitably word would have been leaked to Ron if he was still here that Tepper is looking/interviewing for his replacement.  This also gives Rivera time to spruce up his resume and prepare for interviews himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...