Could burns not play 4-3 olb?

[Eazy-E]

He would have to be used like Seattle used Bruce Irvin or how the Vikings use Anthony Barr.

I much rather just have them try to solidify the 3-4 and let him thrive.

[Ship]

It would be a huge waste of his pass rushing talent. We need some 3-4 DEs

[panthers34]

He’s a pass rushing and will be playing on the line of scrimmage more often than not no matter what the scheme is

[micnificent28]

Anyone still thinking of the 4-3 is living in the past. That also would be a waste of talent trying to get your most talented pass rusher to be a coverage linebacker. We are much closer to having a good 3-4 defense than 4-3 at this point. Hayes,burns, addison, Miller and others showed potential to thrive in it. Just need some big bodies to shore up and game controls and.we back. In the game.

I'm sure whoever the next head coach is will be advise to run a 3-4.

[Harbingers]

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

Anyone still thinking of the 4-3 is living in the past. That also would be a waste of talent trying to get your most talented pass rusher to be a coverage linebacker. We are much closer to having a good 3-4 defense than 4-3 at this point. Hayes,burns, addison, Miller and others showed potential to thrive in it. Just need some big bodies to shore up and game controls and.we back. In the game.

I'm sure whoever the next head coach is will be advise to run a 3-4.

It might be a thing of the past here but, 

7(8 potentially) out of the 12 teams that will make the playoffs this year use 4-3 as their base. That’s with the cowboys and eagles still not for sure(they both run 4-3).

((also it’s pretty clear none of those you listed can do gap coverage/run protection. 3-4 isn’t all about getting to the QB  on the outside and we don’t have a stud NT. Welcome to 150 yards a game on us for for the first time in over a decade.))

[TheRumGone]

We’re staying in a 34

[Harbingers]

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

We’re staying in a 34

We don’t have a Vincent wilfork and nose tackles take time to develop. They aren’t plug and play. Had we kept Star he would have made a perfect nose. Sorry Poe, there’s a reason we picked up KC’s dregs. Hate to say it.

[Harbingers]

4-3

3-4

[TheRumGone]

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

We don’t have a Vincent wilfork and nose tackles take time to develop. They aren’t plug and play. Had we kept Star he would have made a perfect nose. 

Most dlineman take time to develop. This isn’t gonna be a one offseason deal. It’s gonna take some time. 
 

people thinking about Luke are being short sided. My bet is he’s not playing for the panthers in two years.

[Harbingers]

Just now, TheRumGone said:

Most dlineman take time to develop. This isn’t gonna be a one offseason deal. It’s gonna take some time. 
 

people thinking about Luke are being short sided. My bet is he’s not playing for the panthers in two years.

What does Luke have to do with a nose tackle conversation? 

[TheRumGone]

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

What does Luke have to do with a nose tackle conversation? 

Because people have been talking about how the 34 is bad for Luke and we need to get him in his “most natural” position.

Burns and shaq are gonna be the two that we’re gonna build around on defense. Burns is a prototype 34 outside linebacker And shaq is a prototype 34 ilb. I’d imagine a ton of trench drafting and FA signing.

[Harbingers]

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

Because people have been talking about how the 34 is bad for Luke and we need to get him in his “most natural” position.

Burns and shaq are gonna be the two that we’re gonna build around on defense. Burns is a prototype 34 outside linebacker And shaq is a prototype 34 ilb. I’d imagine a ton of trench drafting and FA signing.

I still fail to see what that has to do with fielding a nose tackle next year. 

[TheRumGone]

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I still fail to see what that has to do with fielding a nose tackle next year. 

We’re gonna be poo bro. This isn’t a one year fix. We have a bunch of scrubs on the dline regardless of 43 or 34. Our best bet is we hit on some draft picks and they light it up early. It’s doubtful.

[Harbingers]

Just now, TheRumGone said:

We’re gonna be poo bro. This isn’t a one year fix. We have a bunch of scrubs on the dline regardless of 43 or 34. Our best bet is we hit on some draft picks and they light it up early. It’s doubtful.

A year ago SF was scrubs. A year before LA was scrubs. Last year Baltimore was scrubs. Build around what you have. Not what you want or we will be doomed to a fate worse than death.