Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fewell, I would love for Cam to stay, Not sure why he would be leaving.


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2019/12/23/panthers-coach-perry-fewell-cam-newton-comments/

 

 

Article also points out momentum and all indications of Newton staying in spite of "sourzez". Which is the logical point anyone who has been watching the past few weeks would have come to. You Benched Allen, tanking his value. You cant turn back to him. And Grier....lol 

#CamNewtonmakecarolinagreatagain2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Doesn’t mean that they tell him everything. Why would they tell a guy who has one foot out of the door their strategy?

I mean if you dont like the information from someone who has as much insight into the situation as any report or "sources" you can always scream fake news. But then when "sources"says he'd gone you just eat that up and applaud the decision. Nevermind what those close to the situation are saying.

"Well they probably wouldn't tell him anyway" when you talk in indefinites your already leaving dout in your statement and saying it's a possibility he could have access to said information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Yes his words are probably more valid than anyone not working for the Panthers, but I highly doubt Perry is in the loop for next year’s big decisions.

If the current head coach of the Carolina Panthers isnt credible plz tell me who is? Who can we trust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean if you dont like the information from someone who has as much insight into the situation as any report or "sources" you can always scream fake news. But then when "sources"says he'd gone you just eat that up and applaud the decision. Nevermind what those close to the situation are saying.

"Well they probably wouldn't tell him anyway" when you talk in indefinites your already leaving dout in your statement and saying it's a possibility he could have access to said information.

Agreed.

Notice how angry they get when anything positive is said about Cam? They twist themselves into knots trying to justify why it can't be true. It's fascinating to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cookie Lyon said:

Agreed.

Notice how angry they get when anything positive is said about Cam? They twist themselves into knots trying to justify why it can't be true. It's fascinating to watch.

Agree as well. At this point it seems like a overwhelming load of signs that point to the return of Cam as apposed to the opposite.  Cam has said they with have to trade or release me to get rid of me,(oh hes suppose to day that hes just playing the game). Tepper says he would love to have a healthy cam back(what else is he suppose to say that doesn't mean hes not trading him). Also tepper saying talks with Cam have been positive, all signs point to the go ahead.

But you know "sources" say it's all just a front for the inevitable departure of Cam so... who knows..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DamnItJake! said:

It is mute what the coaches say!! Be professional and tow the company line!! Pull the Fire Alarm or string as u walk out of this bitch!!

I dont usually do the grammar thing, cause lord knows I'm no wordsmith. But its Moot not Mute and Toe not Tow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/12642811-can-i-change-the-name-on-my-cruise-reservation-guest-service-24hr-short
    • I'm not a fan for a couple reasons. You have to nail your 1st 2 picks, especially when you're lacking as much talent across the board as we were and you traded away the number 1 overall pick. Barring injury, they need to be immediate 4 year starters, and on this team, that's a pretty low bar to hurdle. I also really hated the FA strategy building up to the draft, particularly the guards, and the draft strategy itself. A strategy that focused on building around a QB that was so terrible he had no business being on the field. It was clear to pretty much everyone, BY wasn't ready to be an NFL starter. We dumped everything to build around him in the hopes he would become what we drafted him to be. And while the end of the year started showing some promise, we still don't know going into year 3 if he's going to live up to the hype. Dumping all your resources to build around a single player (and hope for the best) isn't as important as building a complete team.  If there's any certainty in drafting, it's HQ interior linemen are found in rounds 2-3, and even 4 pretty regularly. Dumping a ton of FA cash into those 2 spots didn't make sense when we have so many holes. Draft guards, pay tackles. It's one of the staple principles of oline building.  XL was always a project. He didn't have years of consistent high end performance in college. His hands are bricks, he body catches a lot, and he looks more like a 4th round receiver than a 1st. Maybe he improves, maybe not. He looked extremely raw as a rookie and we can only hope he might develop by the time his rookie contract expires. I'm always a fan of drafting guys that actually have hands coming out of college. Who cares if you can get open, or fight for the ball, when you can't actually come down with it consistently.  Then we get to Brooks. Taking a RB with a torn ACL who may or may not see the field in 24/25 over Zach Frasier, who already looks the vet at a position we've been severely deficient at since pre-injury Ryan Kalil. Relying on Corbett, coming off injury, to move from guard to center is never ideal, and the injury bug bit yet again, and we were scrambling trying to find someone to lead our 200m offensive line. And the worst part, we traded up to do it giving up 2 5ths to take Brooks when we're lacking talent everywhere.  Wallace, meh. Sanders looked good before that neck injury. But now we're into day 3 where expectations aren't extremely high for making the roster, unless it's the Panthers, but you can find some position players and rotational players to start plugging the Swiss cheese roster.  I give him credit for getting Coker as an UDFA and the trade for Jackson, but if that's the highlight of your draft, there's some serious problems with your drafting.  If we had saved the FA money spent on the guards, drafted JPJ and Frazier, and still been in pretty close to the same spot, better off cash wise (or spent on other FAs) going into FA this year. Coker ended up playing better than XL in less time. Brooks is Eric Shelton 2.0 right now. And we used 5 picks in the 1st 2 rounds, if you count those included in the trades. That's too much given up for a team that won 2 games the year prior. JMO, but I think the whole offseason strategy last year was flawed from start to finish.  
    • Everything hinges on his ability to build through the draft so it's unknown until we see the upcoming draft class in action. That's all that will ultimately matter. We cannot afford anymore duds or projects especially in the early rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...