Draft Position

[Black&BlueBubba]

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Not that high. You move up one slot per round and the highest 5-11 team moves to the back of the list. Giants aren’t winning and Jax is.

We will pick 7, 38 and 69. Then we go back to 7th in the 4th but no idea where that will be due to comp picks. Probably 108ish.

Hopefully, we don’t fug up 38 and 69. I’m making an assumption that at 7, we’ll be able to not screw up. 38 should be enough to get a top C or G or DT. 69 should be enough to get another of those so I’m OK with one of the stud OTs and move Moton to G. We still need more C/Gs so we can dump Paradis and Turner and those bloated contracts for as bad as they are now. 

Isn’t Paradis not cutabel right now with his contract.  Hell I I remember Hurney has money tied to even the year pas his contract ends.  I think we are stuck with him for a couple more years.  

[PantherCam213]

If we don't draft the best LT @ 7 it won't matter which QB we draft.  He won't last long.

[stirs]

34 or 43?

Answer that and then talk about Dline

[Jared Patterson]

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

I trust @ncfan that the LT drop off is more severe than DT. If so, we get a better combo going LT and then DT at 38 or 69. I don’t disagree on S, but I don’t remember that being a big strength. I’d rather resign Boston and fix the lines.

This is one of the best Tackle drafts in a long time. Only stud DT's are Brown and Kinlaw. Tackles you got Wirfs, Thomas, Wills, Leatherwood, Cleveland, Niang, Prince Tega, Auustin Jackson, Trey Adams, Becton, and Jones. All these guys are future starters at tackle in the NFL; however, I do agree LT would be second on my list if Brown isn't there and either way Im signing a left guard in Free agency and snagging one of these tackles in the first 3 rounds. 

[cookinbrak]

15 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Not that high. You move up one slot per round and the highest 5-11 team moves to the back of the list. Giants aren’t winning and Jax is.

We will pick 7, 38 and 69. Then we go back to 7th in the 4th but no idea where that will be due to comp picks. Probably 108ish.

Hopefully, we don’t fug up 38 and 69. I’m making an assumption that at 7, we’ll be able to not screw up. 38 should be enough to get a top C or G or DT. 69 should be enough to get another of those so I’m OK with one of the stud OTs and move Moton to G. We still need more C/Gs so we can dump Paradis and Turner and those bloated contracts for as bad as they are now. 

Won't matter, Hurney will trade 38 and 69 to move up to 35 to draft a hot dog vendor who "astonishingly puts the mustard UNDERNEATH the weiner".

Then we'll draft a janitor at 108 because he's from Charlotte.

[Captain Morgan]

17 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Best case scenario is Oakland trades pick 15, 18 and maybe a 3rd for our 7th pick to snag a QB

I'd take that deal according to this chart.

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

[firefox1234]

1 hour ago, PantherCam213 said:

If we don't draft the best LT @ 7 it won't matter which QB we draft.  He won't last long.

More or less summarizes why we found ourselves where we are.

[heel31ok]

3 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

More or less summarizes why we found ourselves where we are.

Grier instead of Risner...but at least there is still draft capital...