Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Position


Shocker

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, bobowilson said:

We should make a call to Gettleman and trade up 3 spots to #4 to snatch Tua, leapfrogging both Miami and LA who needs QBs

Wouldn't cost us that much

If it's Hurney making that call they're gonna ask for next year's #1 considering his willingness to give those up in the past.

Going strictly off of the value chart, it would take our 1st and 2nd. Given Hurney'd history with 2nd round picks, that's basically moving up for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

What pick do we have in the second round then?

It depends how many teams finish 5-11.

 

Basically it just revolves after the 1st round, where the team that won the tiebreaker goes to last and other teams move up in position, and it does that every round.

 

So,  

1st round

5. Dolphins

6. Jaguars

7.Chargers

8. Panthers

 

2nd round

5. Jaguars

6. Chargers

7. Panthers

8. Dolphins

3rd round

5. Chargers

6. Panthers

7. Dolphins

8. Jaguars

etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...