Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does it matter?


MountaineerChemist10

Recommended Posts

So I'm 33 years old, planning on seeking my Masters in Forensic Drug Chemistry in the next year or two, possibly my Ph.D. Currently separated, will file no-fault divorce next Summer. Fortunately my ex-wife doesn't want anything but the sofa & our dog. Fine by me.

Currently, I have no children but would love to sometime in the future. My question is does it really matter at what age you have your first kid or two? Must I absolutely be married again? I ask because seeking my Masters & Ph.D will take some time. By the time i'm done, I might very well be in my late 30's/early 40's. Am I on a timeclock?! Feels like I am. What do you think?

I eat healthy about 75% of the time & workout 3-4 times a week, so staying healthy shouldn't be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious, why the extra education?  Job related?  Can you still work full time while pursuing those advanced degrees?

If not, I would wait until you can be financially responsible and take full care of a child, but that's just me.

I had buddies who had kids right out of high school, they are nearing on 18-20 years old now....that just wouldn't work for my need of security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was your age when we had our first (and highly likely to be only) child. 

You're a guy so you have no biological clock. My sister in law was about 35 when she had her first and only child. Her biological clock loudly ticking in her ear has her trapped in a miserable loveless marriage because she desperately wanted to have children. My only advice - don't fuging do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Just curious, why the extra education?  Job related?  Can you still work full time while pursuing those advanced degrees?

If not, I would wait until you can be financially responsible and take full care of a child, but that's just me.

I had buddies who had kids right out of high school, they are nearing on 18-20 years old now....that just wouldn't work for my need of security.

Seeking my Master's takes me a step closer to my dream job (Forensic Toxicologist) & checks another task off my bucket list. I currently work as a Chemist & yes, I could still work full time while pursuing my Master's. It's just a question of when.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you need that degree to get the job you want, go for it. If just getting the degree checks off a bucket list item, maybe ask yourself why it's so important to you to feel the need for that validation. I stopped pursuing my MBA for the exact same reason. I just felt I needed it for... well, some reason. That's a pretty dumb reason to take on a lot of student loan debt so I stopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If you need that degree to get the job you want, go for it. If just getting the degree checks off a bucket list item, maybe ask yourself why it's so important to you to feel the need for that validation. I stopped pursuing my MBA for the exact same reason. I just felt I needed it for... well, some reason. That's a pretty dumb reason to take on a lot of student loan debt so I stopped.

I hear ya. A Master's is definitely something I would need to get my desired job. Most forensic chemists/toxicologists have at least a Masters, even a Ph.D. Becoming a college professor is also on my bucket list & most have at least a Ph.D. And no such thing as a "dumb reason"...most of the time.

I suppose it's better to be safe than sorry. A lot of people I know had kids right after college, some in their 20's, others now in their 30's. And every single one have said "Wait until you're ready". And I am no where NEAR ready. Just want to make sure I don't wait until it's too late...if that's even possible for a guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MountaineerChemist10 said:

I hear ya. A Master's is definitely something I would need to get my desired job. Most forensic chemists/toxicologists have at least a Masters, even a Ph.D. Becoming a college professor is also on my bucket list & most have at least a Ph.D. And no such thing as a "dumb reason"...most of the time.

I suppose it's better to be safe than sorry. A lot of people I know had kids right after college, some in their 20's, others now in their 30's. And every single one have said "Wait until you're ready". And I am no where NEAR ready. Just want to make sure I don't wait until it's too late...if that's even possible for a guy.

We weren't either. Our daughter was absolutely a "whoops" situation. You get ready for it when it happens. 

Trust me, you're absolutely never going to be in a situation where you're like, "Hey, I really don't have much going on in my life for the next 18+ years, so now would be a GREAT time to have a kid!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Arroz con Panther said:

For what it's worth, men absolutely have a biological clock; It's just not as early as women. Even if you can get someone pregnant later on in life your child has an increased risk of complications.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencealert.com/men-have-a-biological-clock-just-like-women-and-it-affects-more-than-them/amp

I don't think it's a shock that reproducing in your physical prime is the best, but we're still talking about long shots for most of these issues. 1 in 47 chance if schizophrenia? That's a shade over 2% chance. I don't think an elevated risk of relatively rare issues is a valid reason to rush reproduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MountaineerChemist10 said:

Seeking my Master's takes me a step closer to my dream job (Forensic Toxicologist) & checks another task off my bucket list. I currently work as a Chemist & yes, I could still work full time while pursuing my Master's. It's just a question of when.

If that's the case go for it, and worry about kids later, you have time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think it's a shock that reproducing in your physical prime is the best, but we're still talking about long shots for most of these issues. 1 in 47 chance if schizophrenia? That's a shade over 2% chance. I don't think an elevated risk of relatively rare issues is a valid reason to rush reproduction.

I agree that it's not worth worrying about that stuff and I'm not telling him to rush reproduction, but he asked. Another thing to think about is how old the woman might be when he's ready. He'll be a doctor by then, so maybe he'll have a woman in her late 20s/early 30s. :Eyes_Emoji_42x42:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just curious. Are you suggesting they should have spent that money on defense instead of offense? Because the only defensive player that walked and was worth bringing back was Luvu. And they tried to get him back. He wanted to leave. Paying Burns $30M a year would have been the worst thing they could have done. Even worse than moving up to draft Bryce. That contract would have been crippling to the cap, and for a mediocre player. And I haven't done the math, but it seems there are just as many new players on defense as there are on offense. Injuries have been the biggest issue with that side of the ball. Improving the worst unit on the team should have always been the priority. Plus a stout o line will attract offensive players like that vet QB everyone wants. Chuba is having a career year. And yes, even Bryce Young is showing some signs of improvement. Change doesn't always happen overnight. But those were the right moves.
    • We’re in dire need of some speed  Luther Burden or Isiah Bond please 
    • Based on the NHL cap today ($88M), the Canes have $22.9M in projected space going into the 25-26 season. Seems to be a consensus the cap will increase to $92.5M next season, but let's not assume. The core of this team is locked up for a couple more years, with the only UFAs at the end of this season: Roslovic, Fast, Robinson, Jost, with Orlov and Burns on D. Remember Seth Jarvis's contract? Remember the press it got because the Canes found a loophole that allowed them to get his contract under the cap by using "deferred salary?" Yeah, don't expect that won't be addressed by the league and that loophole closed. That being said, if the Canes decide to sign Necas long term, they should do it next season and they'll probably need to pay him Aho level money- close to $10M a year. Let's assume the team gets through the season without any career or long term injury concerns. And, let's be honest in the conversation. Does Jesper Fast have a place on this team right now or have we found the right combination on the ice that he may not be needed?  Does Brent Burns retire, or will he decide to stay another year? If so, there's a 1-year thank you for your service $6M deal.  If Roslovic shows out this year, that's gonna be a pretty big contract compared to the 1-year, $2.8M he's getting now. He may command around $4.5 - 5M to stay. So, those 2 guys are gonna cost you $11M. Get Necas a new deal at $10M, you're up to $14.5M of the $22.9M in space. So you've got about $8.4M to work in Orlov and Robinson, which is do-able. Plenty of room to work deals and keep every one of the UFAs if the Canes so desire.  
×
×
  • Create New...