Pats tape shows 8 minutes of Bengals sideline footage

[KB_fan]

6 hours ago, Harbingers said:

Why the bengals? WHY?

I saw someone speculating that it's because they have new coaches.

[LinvilleGorge]

Why the Bengals? I think the simple answer is because this is just what they do. Constantly cheat.

[KB_fan]

1 hour ago, billionairemonk said:

why exactly is this a problem?  someone please tell me what i'm missing.  if the signals are being given so players on the field can see them, then the other team can see them. filming them and reviewing the tapes after the game doesn't help during the game. the video would have to be live for the coaches during the game for there to be an advantage which doesn't make sense because they could just look at the other sideline to see the signals.

Um, you do realize the Patriots were filming the Bengals while they played the Browns. A week before the Patriots play the Bengals. Plenty of time to review that tape.

[Gesualdo]

4 hours ago, mav1234 said:

He is a complete dick.  The way he refuses to allow staff to seek other positions is insane.  But it isn't a reason to ban him.

You can't take an action like banning a coach without direct evidence that he was involved.  As of right now, there is only speculation he is.  There is reason to believe, from his past actions, he could be - maybe even likely is - involved.  But you can't ban him for that.  All we know right now is that a single video was made by Patriots contractors that were not at all hiding who they were, that video filmed sidelines and thus broke rules, and that only 1 of the 2 teams in the game consented to a filming crew at all.  We believe there is more here, and if there is, I think it will come out.  And when it does, there must be swift action taken against the repeat offenders.

man, no one asked your hall monitor bitch ass for a final verdict, or for guidance on legal procedure - what, you think you're a judge or something? you think we don't know that people with actual authority will require further evidence for a binding ruling?

this is an internet message board where people express their opinions, and everyone with a brain has the following opinion: these are cheating-ass motherf*ckers with an established MO, and this fits that MO to a tee. and it's the tip of the iceberg.

cheaters rely on dupes like you. 

[Paa Langfart]

So many questions about why cheat against  the bengals.  Well I think its like this. 

If you don't practice cheating when you play the bad teams,  how are you going to be any good at cheating when you play a good team ?

[TheRumGone]

35 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

So many questions about why cheat against  the bengals.  Well I think its like this. 

If you don't practice cheating when you play the bad teams,  how are you going to be any good at cheating when you play a good team ?

It’s not just that but new coach in the AFC. It’s not just for this year but beyond. They start figuring out his tendencies.

BB was mic’ed up during the super bowl and was heard saying “where’s McVay?” Because he knew a tendency for him during a certain situation. They are the hardest working, cheating organization of all time.

[Shocker]

3 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Can't believe I'm gonna say this but I agree with S.A.S take on it this morning. If the NFL does nothing after Spygate, deflate gate, and now Chiligate, fug it, if you can't beat em, join em. 

They actually did something about those.  Homework man

[Billy Love]

I mean, cheaters gonna cheat. Right? It’s what they. It’s in their DNA. FUGIN cheaters.

[SBiii]

7 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

Shannon Sharpe has come out saying BB should be banned from the league. 

Shannon Sharpe is a dolt of the highest order.

That he is afforded the current platform is astounding...complete fool. 

 

[SBiii]

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not actually predicting anything so much as talking about what I believe.

You need not elaborate on "predicting"......it is known this is not part of your repertoire. 

Big hat, no cattle.

[Mr. Scot]

1 hour ago, SBiii said:

You need not elaborate on "predicting"......it is known this is not part of your repertoire. 

Big hat, no cattle.

Well, if nothing else, it keeps me from looking as goofy as you typically do 

[SBiii]

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, if nothing else, it keeps me from looking as goofy as you typically do 

Assuming Cam Newton is healthy enough to play NFL football in the 2020 season do you predict he will play for:

A.  The Carolina Panthers?

B.  Some other team?

Come on man, live a little! 

Get out of your safe space and get on the record fella!

[SmokinwithWilly]

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

They actually did something about those.  Homework man

what they did was next to nothing. 750k, 4 game suspension and lost 1st round pick for a few SBs. Sounds like a good trade off.

[Mr. Scot]

6 minutes ago, SBiii said:

Assuming Cam Newton is healthy enough to play NFL football in the 2020 season do you predict he will play for:

A.  The Carolina Panthers?

B.  Some other team?

Come on man, live a little! 

Get out of your safe space and get on the record fella!

And sound like one of those hot take driven morons that are always going on the radio guaranteeing something?

Nah.

The story right now is that Newton wants an extension but the Panthers won't give him one. If the two remain at an impasse, then Newton is probably gone. If one side or the other caves in, then he stays, but it's impossible to predict under what circumstances.

That's our situation. It could change. It might not.

You want to try and be Nostradumbass? Feel free. Not my thing.