Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Belicheat back at it


Shocker

Recommended Posts

Theoretically speaking, to be “back at” something, wouldn’t said entity have to at one point or another first pause what they are doing in order to resume at a later point?

Honestly, I don’t think they ever stopped cheating even for a second. Between the original Spygate, Deflategate, the visiting teams’ sideline headsets at Gillette frequently and mysteriously malfunctioning over the last two decades, and now Spygate 2.0? Yeeeeaaaaaah, don’t think they ever stopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m a lifelong Patriots hater like everyone that isn’t a fan.

at the same time, I would say this seems to be a rush to judgement by many who are trying to vindicate themselves for being perennial losers.

the crew did have a series about scouting, went to a press box with media and team executives to film a 1-11 team,...

Thats like driving a van labeled Bank Robbers Incorporated to a bank, getting out in front of the Police station and walking casually to the bank waving at everyone to rob it...

Come on man,...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I’m a lifelong Patriots hater like everyone that isn’t a fan.

at the same time, I would say this seems to be a rush to judgement by many who are trying to vindicate themselves for being perennial losers.

the crew did have a series about scouting, went to a press box with media and team executives to film a 1-11 team,...

Thats like driving a van labeled Bank Robbers Incorporated to a bank, getting out in front of the Police station and walking casually to the bank waving at everyone to rob it...

Come on man,...

 

While I agree we shouldn't rush to judgment I also can recognize that once is happenstance, twice is a coincidence and three times is a well defined pattern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was listening to one of the radio talk shows and there were 2 men on top of a building near where the cowboys practice filming the week before that game.  they haven't stopped.  i hope this screws mcd out of a coaching job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wingo had a great point this morning, they one thing the NFL can't do this time is burn the tapes (well, its 2019, so SD cards). They have to render their judgements and then release the tape. 

If it, as alleged, an entire quarter filming the Bengals sidelines, that would be quite suspicious. 

 

This is from a 2015 article on Business Insider detailing the original Spygate "Soon, advanced scouts would be sent to the games of upcoming Patriots' opponents to film the play signals. The scouts would go undercover as media members, with media credentials listed under "Patriots TV" or "Kraft Productions" and were prepared with excuses of what to say they were filming if security asked."

That sounds eerily similar to what's being discussed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...