Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fire Hurney


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm sure Marty would love for everybody to believe it's that simple.

You think the O-line we've got is an example of good solid roster building?

What about how all those players we acquired for the defense? How are they looking? 

What massive contributions are we getting from our players that were picked outside the first round?

And if the quarterback's health is an issue, didn't we know that in the off season? Wouldn't it have made sense to go after a solid backup?

You're basically just making excuses at this point, dude.

I'm giving reasons, not excuses. I'm not Hurney and Tepper is not my boss. I don't need excuses.

Anybody and everybody can aspire to appear to be an excellent GM after the fact. The funny thing is, no one seems to have all these answers before poo happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

And...

Nevermind, you did. And just as I expected you would.

4 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

Can't blame Hurney

We don't have a player named Rob Cockrell. His name is Ross. And he didn't have a massive screwup today.

I asked you that question to specifically demonstrate that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're basically full of sh-t.

Your answer did exactly that.

Congratulations on looking like a fool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Nevermind, you did. And just as I expected you would.

We don't have a player named Rob Cockrell. His name is Ross. And he didn't have a massive screwup today.

I asked you that question to specifically demonstrate that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're basically full of sh-t.

Your answer did exactly that.

Congratulations on looking like a fool.

"Can't blame Hurney for that "was my answer which is absolutely true.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nevermind, you did. And just as I expected you would.

We don't have a player named Rob Cockrell. His name is Ross. And he didn't have a massive screwup today.

I asked you that question to specifically demonstrate that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're basically full of sh-t.

Your answer did exactly that.

Congratulations on looking like a fool.

And I was beginning to ask you, "What massive screw up did Cockrell have?"

You sly devil! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, heel31ok said:

Yet you missed...

You didn't know what screw up I was talking about because you probably didn't even watch the game.

You didn't know that we don't have a player by that name. Heck, you probably don't even know who half our players are.

The fact that you don't know jack about the team makes it easy to jerk your chain.

Now-Comes-The-Part-Where-We-Throw-Our-He

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

You didn't know what screw up I was talking about because you probably didn't even watch the game.

You didn't know that we don't have a player by that name. Heck, you probably don't even know who half our players are.

The fact that you don't know jack about the team makes it easy to jerk your chain.

Now-Comes-The-Part-Where-We-Throw-Our-He

 

Strike 2...i just thought you didn't know his name.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heel31ok said:

Strike 2...i just thought you didn't know his name.

I could have put any fake name in there I wanted to and you wouldn't have known.

See, I can actually debate somebody like Top Dawg because he has a clue. You, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PFF feeds the beast.  So it’s largely popular for that IMO and is embraced by the NFL machine because it helps feed the beast.  Thats why you see the cute stats pop on the Monday Night football screen lol.  Hot takes? Fantasy football? Yeah, it’s good for the NFL machine for lots of reason.  I do think the league embraces them.  Not because they are actually good at doing what they claim. actual analytics folks are critical of PFF.  Because it’s not analytics.  It’s subjective goobly goo ratings by dudes that aren’t really qualified nor even have the info to do real grading.  you got legit NFL players who say they have literally put PFF grades by the coaches grades and they are worlds apart.  Players have laughed at them pretending they can grade certain plays without the underlining info.  NFL coaches have called out there bologna at pressers.   could it be a quick tool to find out some info that has nothing to with their subjective grades? Sure.  There is a lot of data on 32 teams for cheap. But I do not buy the narrative 32 NFL teams think their grades are worth a poo or remotely accurate or meaningful. 
    • Bills D looks like ass
    • I think that win vs Dallas gave them a big boost of confidence.  Thats a team that blew us out the past 2 seasons. Even when Bryce was playing okay late last season they still beat us pretty bad.  Lets see if we slaughter the Jets or go back to playing sloppy uninspired football and go from there. 
×
×
  • Create New...