Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney should stay on with the Panthers...


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

2019: Brian Burns

2018: DJ Moore

2012: Luke Keuchly

2011: Cam Newton

2010: Everette Brown

2009: Jeff Otah

2008: Jonathan Stewart, Jeff Otah

2007: Jon Beason

2006: DeAngelo Williams

2005: Thomas Davis

2004: Chris Gamble

2003: Jordan Gross

2002: Julius Peppers

 

I must say, even with the obvious flubs in 2008-2010, that is pretty impressive. 

Everette Brown wasn't a first round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Are we certain he can still do this if he's not around to ensure that we have a sh-tty record so we're picking in the top half of the round?

So what exactly did Hurney do to ensure our sh-tty record this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, that's a little bit of a shot at Hurney, as was the double listing of Otah. Traded first round picks to get both of them.

Eh Otah was a very good to great player, his rookie season was dominant.  Just couldn’t stay healthy.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jfra78 said:

At the time of both signings they looked solid

At the time of Armanti Edwards drafting, that looked good too.

Nobody judges results by whether they seemed like a good idea at the time. About 99% of the time, they do. That they seem to be but then turn out not to be is what makes a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jfra78 said:

At the time of both signings they looked solid

This is true. Widely regarded as good signings across the spectrum of sports media, as well. 

I won't lie, I will admit that I have thought that perhaps our OL struggles have an element of coaching that has failed. It's strange that so many on the line that had previously been solid are suddenly looking like garbage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

This is true. Widely regarded as good signings across the spectrum of sports media, as well. 

I won't lie, I will admit that I have thought that perhaps our OL struggles have an element of coaching that has failed. It's strange that so many on the line that had previously been solid are suddenly looking like garbage. 

Matsko must go or else 2020 will be a repeat of 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...