Gaulden gone

[Car123]

6 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I believe it’s still your turn. I’ve shown plenty. Where you have scraped together two post with excuses and shots in them. Real convincing. Catch up an we can talk. Otherwise, remain the hypocritical troll you have always been. 
 

Just for kicks.....an oldie but goodie

 

Matt Kalil, Matt Kalil, Matt Kalil

[Toomers]

2 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Matt Kalil, Matt Kalil, Matt Kalil

As opposed to nothing, a slight, and an excuse from your archive. Seriously? Where is ANYTHING from your hypocritical troll self. 

How about this one...... any Kalil there. 
 

Toomers     2,080

•  
  •  

Posted May 26

   On 5/25/2019 at 10:37 PM,  Peon Awesome said: 

I do disagree with the way the organization disregards safety; I'm just saying that it's wishful thinking based on that to think we would actually trade up for one. 

I think most of us were pulling for Justin Reid to land with us.  It's just hard to know when we should have pulled the trigger on a trade. What would we have had top give up? Ian Thomas? If he turns into the heir apparent of Olsen and Gaulden turns into a serviceable starter, we're probably better off not making that trade. 

  Then it isn’t “hindsight”. It’s being right in saying we made the wrong decision. Just like debating any pick in any draft. Why is that so horrible to discuss? I ranted for a year because Gettleman traded away Carl Lawson And Eddie Jackson for Daeshaun Hall. As it happened until now. Why follow any of it if you can’t give an honest opinion of what you see?

[Toomers]

13 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Yes, our window closed the moment he rescinded the tag. The money was used for KK... so it was wasted.

KK didn’t sign until 2017. And not having an overpaid zone CB who would have been pissed all year didn’t close anything. 

[Car123]

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

KK didn’t sign until 2017. And not having an overpaid zone CB who would have been pissed all year didn’t close anything. 

But but but carry over, huh?

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, Car123 said:

But but but carry over, huh?

Whatever that means. He used the money to extend Oher and Coleman. Not on KK. Which none of it matters to your Men In Black 3 theory or your constant hypocritical ways. Stay focused and stop trying to deflect t away from your BS. 

[Cpt slay a ho]

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

   Unless it was a pick by another GM who cut your luvee? Might that have something to do with it? 

Your new nickname is Brienne Tarth, House gettleman 

[Toomers]

2 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Your new nickname is Brienne Tarth, House gettleman 

[Car123]

17 minutes ago, Toomers said:

As opposed to nothing, a slight, and an excuse from your archive. Seriously? Where is ANYTHING from your hypocritical troll self. 

How about this one...... any Kalil there. 
 

Toomers     2,080

 

•  
  •  

Posted May 26

   On 5/25/2019 at 10:37 PM,  Peon Awesome said: 

I do disagree with the way the organization disregards safety; I'm just saying that it's wishful thinking based on that to think we would actually trade up for one. 

I think most of us were pulling for Justin Reid to land with us.  It's just hard to know when we should have pulled the trigger on a trade. What would we have had top give up? Ian Thomas? If he turns into the heir apparent of Olsen and Gaulden turns into a serviceable starter, we're probably better off not making that trade. 

  Then it isn’t “hindsight”. It’s being right in saying we made the wrong decision. Just like debating any pick in any draft. Why is that so horrible to discuss? I ranted for a year because Gettleman traded away Carl Lawson And Eddie Jackson for Daeshaun Hall. As it happened until now. Why follow any of it if you can’t give an honest opinion of what you see?

"I like the pick. I just hope he's good at creating separation."

- Me when DG selected Funchess.

 

Listen I liked DG until the 2016 offseason.

[Toomers]

4 minutes ago, Car123 said:

"I like the pick. I just hope he's good at creating separation."

- Me when DG selected Funchess.

 

Listen I liked DG until the 2016 offseason.

    That’s 3. Another very convincing one....lol. Only about 40 more and we can be even. When you show me you bashing a Hurney move through an entire thread, you will still be a hypocrite. Remember you called me out and who has proven their point with tons more evidence. 
 

  And he let Josh go and it got personal to you. So don’t act like everyone has an emotional attachment like yours. Some people are just talking football. 

[Car123]

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

    That’s 3. Another very convincing one....lol. Only about 40 more and we can be even. When you show me you bashing a Hurney move through an entire thread, you will still be a hypocrite. Remember you called me out and who has proven their point with tons more evidence. 
 

  And he let Josh go and it got personal to you. So don’t act like everyone has an emotional attachment like yours. Some people are just talking football. 

How many times have I said Hurney was a bad GM from 2009-2012?

[Car123]

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

    That’s 3. Another very convincing one....lol. Only about 40 more and we can be even. When you show me you bashing a Hurney move through an entire thread, you will still be a hypocrite. Remember you called me out and who has proven their point with tons more evidence. 
 

  And he let Josh go and it got personal to you. So don’t act like everyone has an emotional attachment like yours. Some people are just talking football. 

I don't give af about Norman. I don't even like him that much and I believe it would have been foolish to give a 28yo big money. It got personal to me because we went into the season with rookies at CB when the rest of our team was pretty solid. That should have been another SB run.

[Toomers]

2 minutes ago, Car123 said:

How many times have I said Hurney was a bad GM from 2009-2012?

   Not much obviously. Your first example last week was something like that but No “bad GM”. 
If you said that why not post those if you said it enough to Cry “how many times”?  So which is it? 

[Toomers]

Just now, Car123 said:

I don't give af about Norman. I don't even like him that much and I believe it would have been foolish to give a 28yo big money. It got personal to me because we went into the season with rookies at CB when the rest of our team was pretty solid. That should have been another SB run.

So coming off a SB team, you decided that Gettleman was the devil reborn before another game was played. And it had nothing to do with Josh. Who you bestowed magical powers on earlier? Sure. Go with that. Really doesn’t matter. You are the most biased poster on this board when it comes to Hurney. That’s a fact. Yet you have the nerve to call everyone else out for being biased. That’s the definition of hypocritical.  

  

[Car123]

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Not much obviously. Your first example last week was something like that but No “bad GM”. 
If you said that why not post those if you said it enough to Cry “how many times”?  So which is it?