Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gaulden gone


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Car123 said:

I want you to find your 100 posts of hurney praise. Waiting.

Ok.  Do you think I don’t have them? 
 

  Loser leaves town. If I post 100 separate posts bashing Gettleman/ praising Hurney you are gone. If I can’t, I’m gone. Enough BS. Be a man or STFU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Ok.  Do you think I don’t have them? 
 

  Loser leaves town. If I post 100 separate posts bashing Gettleman/ praising Hurney you are gone. If I can’t, I’m gone. Enough BS. Be a man or STFU. 

I don't care if you stay or go.

raw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Car123 said:

I don't care if you stay or go.

raw

Just like normal, when it comes to facts or proof, you run like a coward. Call people out for what you do everyday. Hypocritical POS. 
 

And here’s the starters just to let folks know which one of us is biased and which isn’t. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toomers said:

Just like normal, when it comes to facts or proof, you run like a coward. Call people out for what you do everyday. Hypocritical POS. 
 

And here’s the starters just to let folks know which one of us is biased and which isn’t. 
 

 

Dude the only criticism of DG is the Matt Kalil contract. You even called Kony Ealy a success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Dude the only criticism of DG is the Matt Kalil contract. You even called Kony Ealy a success.

   Same BS response as last week when I answered plainly. But I’ll post it again below because you’re too stupid to remember what you were trolling from week to week. And If you are talking about me bringing up Kony Ealy, sarcastically, as a response to your ridiculous list....try again. 
 

   On 11/18/2019 at 1:30 PM,  Car123 said: 

No sane person would defend that contract.  4 years of being a GM and that's your only criticism. :)

You asked for a POST. I provided many of them. In separate threads. And have many more. Yet you, can only find a random throwaway post that makes excuses more than anything. That’s it. In four years? I’ve had plenty of occasions where I disagreed. Such as.....
 

  Kony Ealy over A Robinson. 
  Drafting Funchess. 
  Not trading our 1st for Joe Thomas

  Drafting Butler and Worley(unless they moved him to S)

  Signing Kurt Coleman to an extension

  The 2017 draft. I was against using a top 10 pick on CMC(who shoved the crow down my throat) 

 Trading up for Daeshon Hall instead of waiting for Eddie Jackson and Carl Lawson. And I’ve complained about it ever since.  Stbugs knows this well as we complained about Gaulden the following year. See, unlike you, I don’t care who makes the move. 
 

   How many more? Considering I offered to LEAVE forever and you STILL can’t produce anything, I guess desperation’s the next step. 
 
  Considering you have found an entire ONE post  to claim your unbiased. Uhhhh..OK. Then question me about 20x that just in a couple threads alone. Ask Mr. Scot. He will tell you how much of a Gettleman homer I am. He got to hear a lot of it.. 

 And there were plenty of the normal crowd  that were mad as hell at me for bashing Kalil signing. And the contract. And why did it take all that time to figure out that it wasn’t Hurney who restructured Kalils contract. Does no one who supports Hurney know anything about the cap.Hold on.....that would make sense. Why did I have to come to his defense? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Same BS response as last week when I answered plainly. But I’ll post it again below because you’re too stupid to remember what you were trolling from week to week. And If you are talking about me bringing up Kony Ealy, sarcastically, as a response to your ridiculous list....try again. 
 

   On 11/18/2019 at 1:30 PM,  Car123 said: 

No sane person would defend that contract.  4 years of being a GM and that's your only criticism. :)

You asked for a POST. I provided many of them. In separate threads. And have many more. Yet you, can only find a random throwaway post that makes excuses more than anything. That’s it. In four years? I’ve had plenty of occasions where I disagreed. Such as.....
 

  Kony Ealy over A Robinson. 
  Drafting Funchess. 
  Not trading our 1st for Joe Thomas

  Drafting Butler and Worley(unless they moved him to S)

  Signing Kurt Coleman to an extension

  The 2017 draft. I was against using a top 10 pick on CMC(who shoved the crow down my throat) 

 Trading up for Daeshon Hall instead of waiting for Eddie Jackson and Carl Lawson. And I’ve complained about it ever since.  Stbugs knows this well as we complained about Gaulden the following year. See, unlike you, I don’t care who makes the move. 
 

   How many more? Considering I offered to LEAVE forever and you STILL can’t produce anything, I guess desperation’s the next step. 
 
  Considering you have found an entire ONE post  to claim your unbiased. Uhhhh..OK. Then question me about 20x that just in a couple threads alone. Ask Mr. Scot. He will tell you how much of a Gettleman homer I am. He got to hear a lot of it.. 

 And there were plenty of the normal crowd  that were mad as hell at me for bashing Kalil signing. And the contract. And why did it take all that time to figure out that it wasn’t Hurney who restructured Kalils contract. Does no one who supports Hurney know anything about the cap.Hold on.....that would make sense. Why did I have to come to his defense? 
 

Find the posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Find the posts.

I believe it’s still your turn. I’ve shown plenty. Where you have scraped together two post with excuses and shots in them. Real convincing. Catch up an we can talk. Otherwise, remain the hypocritical troll you have always been. 
 

Just for kicks.....an oldie but goodie

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Car123 said:

That the point of my initial post, ffs. 

  And you feel a “wishful at best” scenario is evidence that spending 14M on Josh in 2016, even with the benefit of hindsight, was good for the team? Seriously? 

  Just like yesterday, I’ve seen people reach pretty far on here to further an agenda, but this is the new King? Congrats. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toomers said:

  And you feel a “wishful at best” scenario is evidence that spending 14M on Josh in 2016, even with the benefit of hindsight, was good for the team? Seriously? 

  Just like yesterday, I’ve seen people reach pretty far on here to further an agenda, but this is the new King? Congrats. 

 

Yes, our window closed the moment he rescinded the tag. The money was used for KK... so it was wasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...