Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Winning/Losing close games


ellis

Recommended Posts

I get it: when you’ve got a UDFA + injured starter in the mix, you’ll lose a few close ones. Cam and Kyle have both been on that raw end of that. 

In many of those close losses, it really feels like a defensive and game management issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2018 is when the Panthers gradually began to decrease Newton's rushing attempts. Obviously we know what happened in the second half of that season.

In 2017 Cam was our leading rusher. One of the biggest differences we are seeing in this offense now versus years past is not having a dynamic first down machine like Newton at our disposal at any given moment. Especially in the red zone. Even with a talent like McCaffrey in the backfield we've failed to punch it in multiple times with the game on the line.

The Panthers need to figure out how to win without a transcendent talent behind center. That begins with better situational playcalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheRed said:

In 2017 Cam was our leading rusher. One of the biggest differences we are seeing in this offense now versus years past is not having a dynamic first down machine like Newton at our disposal at any given moment. Especially in the red zone. Even with a talent like McCaffrey in the backfield we've failed to punch it in multiple times with the game on the line.

I dunno, I sort of agree with the sentiment, but not entirely.  CMC has touched the ball 289 times this season, and 27% of his touches have resulted in first downs.  CMC has pretty much been that dynamic playmaker that Cam was, just in a different way.

I get what you're saying about punching it in on the goal line, but I feel like that has WAY more to do with out horrific OLine play than not having good enough talent in the backfield.  Goal line situations have always been about line play and moving people off the ball . . . and we've been really bad at this in 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

So we're basically the East Coast version of the LA/San Diego Chargers with all the way they blow close games. Not surprising when you realize Ron and now Norv used to work with them.

Pretty much. Sarah Spain led a segment talking about a team that does well when nobody is paying attention and folds when the spotlight gets on them. I thought she was talking about us. Nope, it was the Chargers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ellis said:

 

For the longest time early in Ron's tenure we were absolutely atrocious in games decided by a possession or less. Then for a brief period we rebounded and now we're right back to being atrocious again. It's becoming more and more clear to me that Ron simply peaked around that 2015 season and we've been seeing a regression toward the mean ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know--they represent the entire body of players and this be determined, if it got to that point, by a vote of all veterans and rookies who are part of the union.  If the elite players are getting 50% of all cap increases, the non-elite players with shorter careers might want a bigger slice of the pie and vote accordingly.  To say that the Union would not go for it is not something I agree with--it would be the union that proposes it--based on a proposal and a majority vote.  If the veteran players vote for an equal distribution framework, then all 53 on a roster benefit from a cap increase that is applicable to the entire team.  Not sure how labor laws might be impacted...
    • Carter, Graham, or Walker and I might roll the dice hoping Walker is around later.  If Hunter is there at 8, we are about to get a really nice haul for trading back.
    • Oh well. That's his fault if he wants to eat up all the cap space and have no protection as a result. A big part of why Brady has all those rings is that he generally took team friendly deals. Not that he wasn't making a mega ass ton of money, but he wasn't leaving his team cap strapped due to his contract while Peyton Manning generally tried to negotiate for every dime he could get forcing the Colts to make tough decisions.
×
×
  • Create New...