Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if RR goes and Hurney stays


lovelett

Recommended Posts

Hurney has certainly shown very different tendancies in this go around as our GM.  A couple more years of this and he's likely to be seen as a legit GM in his own right.  It certainly appears that JR was having a much greater hand in personnel decisions than was made obvious at the time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I say clean house. If we lose Rivera that means that we don't make the playoffs and we most likely don't have a winning record. That would be yet another non-winning season on Hurney's resume, and that's not great. 

In my personal opinion with the value of hindsight, Hurney has too many one year deals on quality starters this year, instead of 1 year "Prove it" deals like Gettleman used to do with mid-tier/lesser known commodities that he identified as potential fits for our system. Specifically with Irvin, McCoy, Boston, and (to a lesser extent) Daryl Williams. Most if not all of those guys are going to want long term deals this offseason, but who of those can we afford to keep in addition to Bradberry AND Shaq? Half of our defensive starters are set to be free agents next year (including Mario Addison), and that's poor asset planning for the future (in my opinion at least). 

This doesn't include guys like Cockrell, Butler, Love, and Obada who have proven to be quality depth for us this year. 

Not to mention the two long term deals that he actually did give out to Reid and Paradis last offseason have kind of been flops so far. 

We've seen 14 years of Marty Hurney as GM. It peaked in 2003. It's way past time we moved on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was very anti-Hurney in the past and thought it was ridiculous when he was brought back, but I've changed my tune - probably because Hurney has changed his.

He's a better GM than he was before, and I don't have any real complaints. I'd like to see him stick - as unbelievable as that would have been for me to say in the past. Seriously, I can't believe I'm saying that, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.
    • I'm not sure if NO will be as QB aggressive as some assume.  They may focus on landing a top line prospect and slow rolling the rebuild for next year.  Could see them roll the dice in R3-4 to compete with Rattler, maybe a Howard fit.     I think the QB starved team's just take the gamble the Saints don't want Sanders, and target a mid to late 1st pick for a trade up to land him.  Still don't think Milroe or Shough are going R1.   But I think what may get lost in the trade up talk is about it being QB specific. A top team trying to get over the top could be the juicy trade (or two) that happens in round 1. Something I've flirted with is how aggressive Buffalo could be.  They have the ammunition for a big trade up, and I think Golden would pair super well with Coleman.  They need to cut to the chase and get playmakers there for Allen.  So yeah, love the idea of a BUF/ATL trade where they move up for him.  I'm even thinking about LAR getting aggressive for Warren or Loveland.  Imagine McVay rolling into 2026 with that added piece for a future QB...      
×
×
  • Create New...