Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Give Ron, Hurney, and Cam 1 more year or part ways with them?

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

Keep Ron, Hurney, and Cam for another year or move on from them  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you give Ron, Hurney, and Cam one more chance next season or do you finally part ways with all 3 of them?

    • Give them one more shot
      26
    • Cut Cam and fire Ron and Hurney
      30

Recommended Posts

Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted

....only thing about ronald...think hes ok. like what he stands for... but he seems slowly reactive and not in any way shape or form proactive. We'll be 8-8 as an average with him... The thing we all fell in love with about  Cam...he cant do no mo.... and well Marty...hes still a hack beat reporter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KDawg004 Rookie

KDawg004

Posted
Posted

Rivera is toast. Get him out of here. We need a new mind with fresh ideas in here. Change the philosophy of the team and keep with the times.

Hurney, I’ve been impressed with his second go around but chances of him staying without Rivera are slim. They seem tied to each other. Although I would be interested in seeing how he would operate under a different coaching staff.

I may be in the minority but I think it would be asinine to cut bait with Newton. I know he has his injury history, I get it. But his contract is not ludicrous. Let’s see what he can do once he’s healthy and under a competent coach/offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, bmoshx said:

Keep Ron, as much as everyone in here complains about him, he isn’t that bad.

Oh sweet baby Jesus.  

If he isn’t that bad then please find someone who can instruct the defensive genius how to stop the run.  That failure is so bad with yards per run that it is reaching Nfl historic proportions 

it also takes quite the genius to make Luke a non factor because of scheme.  You remember Luke, our used to be best defensive player

I'm with Igo, after 9 years of mediocrity, his ass can’t be gone soon enough.  He is, at best, Marvin Lewis 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is the problem.

(some people will understand what that means, some won't)

I keep seeing the same said about Hurney in this thread as well.  "He's done OK in his 2nd stint"

In the NFL OK ain't poo, it's good to great, or keep churning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cavscout Proficient

Cavscout

Posted
Posted
On 11/13/2019 at 2:30 PM, Cpt slay a ho said:

Figure out some way to keep hurney, unless the Steelers gm is an option.

Ron has gotta go, too much inconsistent coaching 

Cam, if 100% healthy should be kept and either Grier or Allen should further be developed as a replacement. 
 

I was critical of Colbert after the Miami trade but I’ll be damn if that didn’t make a workds difference for the Steelers who are in the playoff hunt 

I totally agree with everything...just like to add that we should change to black helmets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...