Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Give Ron, Hurney, and Cam 1 more year or part ways with them?

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

Keep Ron, Hurney, and Cam for another year or move on from them  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you give Ron, Hurney, and Cam one more chance next season or do you finally part ways with all 3 of them?

    • Give them one more shot
      26
    • Cut Cam and fire Ron and Hurney
      30

Recommended Posts

Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
Posted

I saw @CRApost it in another thread and it got me thinking; If Ron and co go 9-7 or 10-6 with Kyle Allen does Tepper give them one more shot to see if Cam can stay healthy / worth extending.

A lot of people say Ron, Hurney, and Cam are a package deal so you have to imagine if Ron is fired it probably means the end of Cam in Carolina as well.

If the only way to give Cam another shot means keeping Ron and Hurney, do you do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cpt slay a ho Mentor

Cpt slay a ho

Posted
Posted

Figure out some way to keep hurney, unless the Steelers gm is an option.

Ron has gotta go, too much inconsistent coaching 

Cam, if 100% healthy should be kept and either Grier or Allen should further be developed as a replacement. 
 

I was critical of Colbert after the Miami trade but I’ll be damn if that didn’t make a workds difference for the Steelers who are in the playoff hunt 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

If we go in another direction it will probably go a lot like the Bengals. The team will absolutely implode and then it will be time for a complete top to bottom rebuild. And fans might be clamoring for the semi-competitive days of Ron Rivera. 

Ron will never get this team a Super Bowl championship. It’s obvious. But he’s not bad enough to be a basement dweller either. It’s a lose lose situation right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, hepcat said:

If we go in another direction it will probably go a lot like the Bengals. The team will absolutely implode and then it will be time for a complete top to bottom rebuild. And fans might be clamoring for the semi-competitive days of Ron Rivera. 

Ron will never get this team a Super Bowl championship. It’s obvious. But he’s not bad enough to be a basement dweller either. It’s a lose lose situation right now. 

This league isn't kind to the 7-9/9-7 teams.

We were a bottom dweller for 1 season the last time Marty Hurney was here, and we got Cam Newton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...