Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alan vs Newton. Be honest. Who is better?

TheMostInterestingMan

By TheMostInterestingMan,
in Carolina Panthers

Alan Turn vs Isaac Newton  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Who was better? Alan or Newton?


Recommended Posts

TheMostInterestingMan Mentor

TheMostInterestingMan

Posted
Posted

No doubt Isaac Newton is the bigger name and probably the favorite on this debate. He’s widely regarded as one of the greatest mathematical minds of all time. Some consider him the most influential scientist ever with his breakthrough formula for the laws of motion. He was a groundbreaking physicist. 

Of course Alan Turing, despite being an underdog, may have have had a bigger impact on modern society. He basically invented the computer and was largely responsible for winning WWII. He is considered the father of artificial intelligence and theoretical computer science. 

So put your bias aside. I don’t need your slanted agenda driven drivel. At the end of the day if you are being honest with yourself, who is better? Isaac Newton or Alan Turing? Let’s get this settled once and for all. 

8F874AB4-3310-4FFC-BAB8-F3F9733DAF35.png

8F94E168-22EC-48A7-B05D-CDE94F6AB552.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Chiefs vs Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • MHS831
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • TheSpecialJuan
      Predictions for Brooks debut

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...