Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol @ you


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Today is a shining example about who among us has the emotional maturity of a three-year-old child.

we are currently losing a game that everyone and their grandmother pretty much expected us to lose. Yes I too hoped to we would win today, but I also recognized the Mammoth task of beating an undefeated team in their own house. But alas It is not meant to be.

If you believe something before today, there is nothing from a single game that should change that opinion.

yes we are getting killed and it’s not fun, but poo happens. 
 

keep pounding mofos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

There were a lot of similar posts falling the Steelers debacle last year. Just saying.

There’s a lot of post like that after we have a bad loss every year. I’ve been here since the second year of the huddle it’s a rinse and repeat Of people showing how emotionally immature they are.

The fact that you’re already reacting like: “ What if this turns out to be like the Steelers?“ Only adds to what I’m saying. Grow up peopleOnly adds to what I’m saying. Grow up people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc Holiday said:

There’s a lot of post like that after we have a bad loss every year. I’ve been here since the second year of the huddle it’s a rinse and repeat Of people showing how emotionally immature they are.

The fact that you’re already reacting like: “ What if this turns out to be like the Steelers?“ Only adds to what I’m saying. Grow up peopleOnly adds to what I’m saying. Grow up people

Pointing out a potential serious flaw to your logic only adds to what you're saying?

LOL!

Okay, buddy... I'll leave you to your delusions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I get the ra ra pep talk thing but you can't ignore what's right in front of your face. Take a gander at the Panthers record after the bye week under Rivera. All the coach of the year awards in the world can't polish that up.

I’m not saying you should ignore his record After the by week.

i’m saying that nothing today should change your opinion that you help before hand.

even what you stated was a known fact leading into this game. Why should Rivera repeating history change your opinion that you had for or against him before today? It shouldn’t.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Pointing out a potential serious flaw to your logic only adds to what you're saying?

LOL!

Okay, buddy... I'll leave you to your delusions 

Delusional? I’m not the one freaking out over Ron Rivera yet again losing a game after a bye. Seriously if you watch the Panthers last 10 years who saw that coming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc Holiday said:

Delusional? I’m not the one freaking out over Ron Rivera yet again losing a game after a bye. Seriously if you watch the Panthers last 10 years who saw that coming?

When I said delusional, I meant in your own thoughts. My original reply clearly laid out a reason why logical people might be concerned about a mid-season blowout. You somehow interpreted that as only reinforcing your original point.

I didn't expect to win this game and had talked the past two weeks about how the Niners are the worst match up in the NFL for us, but I didn't expect to see a wholly unprepared team coming off of the bye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...