Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should I Listen to Bill, or Todd Bowles the DC We Destroyed in 2015


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFIGJiA1zc8

I'd wanna prop up Kyle Allen to after Newton did this with a bunch of no name / considered bust receivers. People really forget how good a healthy Cam is. Ginn / Brown / Cotchery / Olse / Funchess (rookie)

 

Oh yeah, and the other time we faced Bowles with a healthy Cam... :thinking:

 

 

I mean facts do matter...not sure you really remember that game since you are pimping it as Cam owning Bowles.

Cam completed 39% of his passes for 168 yards, no passing TDs.  3 sacks and a fumble.  His worst game of the season.  He did add 28 yards on the ground and a score though. 

Jets had our O figured out and stopped.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I remember in 2014 after a few good games.. Ppl thought KB was a good replacement for Smitty..

Lol

Hey we've been undefeated and strong run game since Daryl Williams took over for Turner at RG

 

Guess we should extend Williams and get rid of Williams too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From October 1st, regarding the now fired Jay Gruden...

Belichick is notorious for building up opponents. If you asked him about Eric Washington, he'd probably describe him as a great defensive coordinator.

That's not to say any of his compliments are invalid, mind you, but you've got to be kind of careful about going by what Belichick says.

Not saying you're wrong, but what is Bill's record against Cam? 9nly way that they could stop him was a cheap shot/late hit to the back in preseason. Beyond that, they had no real answer for him. Maybe that's the reason Cam was considered public enemy#1?

Only way he could be stopped was late hits and cheap shots (that the refs and league allowed) and he was only limited by Shula, no name receivers, and a barely existing OL.

The media and league and a significant segment of our own fanbase never liked him and wanted him to fail. He was far better than anyone thought and the only way he was going to be stopped was through constant abuse of his body through illegal, late, and cheap shots which went unpenalized for far too long under the rationale that 1) he's big enough that he can take it 2) he needs to be knocked down a few pegs and 3) he wasn't old enough. 

Cam was the most lethal QB in the league because there had never been anyone like him and his talents were wasted on a bad and mismanaged team.

Allen is good.... so far, but he's no Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Not saying you're wrong, but what is Bill's record against Cam? 9nly way that they could stop him was a cheap shot/late hit to the back in preseason. Beyond that, they had no real answer for him. Maybe that's the reason Cam was considered public enemy#1?

Only way he could be stopped was late hits and cheap shots (that the refs and league allowed) and he was only limited by Shula, no name receivers, and a barely existing OL.

The media and league and a significant segment of our own fanbase never liked him and wanted him to fail. He was far better than anyone thought and the only way he was going to be stopped was through constant abuse of his body through illegal, late, and cheap shots which went unpenalized for far too long under the rationale that 1) he's big enough that he can take it 2) he needs to be knocked down a few pegs and 3) he wasn't old enough. 

Cam was the most lethal QB in the league because there had never been anyone like him and his talents were wasted on a bad and mismanaged team.

Allen is good.... so far, but he's no Cam.

Does not being Cam equal being bad, though?

There are an awful lot of quarterbacks that the NFL perceives as being successful who are also not Cam. if you're going to make that the standard for declaring whether Kyle Allen is good or not, I think I can guess the conclusion.

Honestly, that's probably part of the issue with the scenarios here.

We've got people whose whole premise is that if he can't do what Newton does, he's never going to be as good. Reality is that there are a pretty good number of quarterbacks in the league who can't or don't do what Newton does but still manage to win a lot of games.

You have to look at it objectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Does not being Cam equal being bad, though?

There are an awful lot of quarterbacks that the NFL perceives as being successful who are also not Cam. if you're going to make that the standard for declaring whether Kyle Allen is good or not, I think I can guess the conclusion.

Honestly, that's probably part of the issue with the scenarios here.

I think Allen is an ok QB and a decent fit for the system. I don't think he's a star. Cam was a guy you build a team around (that we should have done a better job of) because of the skillset he brings. Allen is a guy you plug into a system and hope he does well enough.

I am not, nor have I said, he's bad. I'm just not ready to crown him. As I've said before, he seems like a good enough game manager, but not much more than that. 

He's a good story, but I don't see him as a guy you can put the team on his back the way that Cam and Jake did. At least not yet I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Does not being Cam equal being bad, though?

There are an awful lot of quarterbacks that the NFL perceives as being successful who are also not Cam. if you're going to make that the standard for declaring whether Kyle Allen is good or not, I think I can guess the conclusion.

Honestly, that's probably part of the issue with the scenarios here.

We've got people whose whole premise is that if he can't do what Newton does, he's never going to be as good. Reality is that there are a pretty good number of quarterbacks in the league who can't or don't do what Newton does but still manage to win a lot of games.

You have to look at it objectively.

This is BS.. It doesn't have to be the same way Cam did it..  If Kyle was playing like Kurt Warner when he took over for Trent Green this isn't even a debate.. If Kyle was a elite passer and we can see him carry a team (like a Cam, Russell, Rodgers) this isn't a debate.. Some ppl here can see when a team is carrying a QB or vice-versa..

It comes down to is Kyle more of a Andy Dalton or can he be a Phillp Rivers type QB.. We don't know.. But reality is when healthy you have a guy who has proven he is a QB who can carry a team..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...