Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

10+ NFL teams really interested in seeing if Cam Newton goes up for trade


Saca312

Recommended Posts

If there's a universe where you could get multiple 1sts for Cam - which almost certainly isn't the case - you do that without thinking.  Combine with the talent we already have, and overnight we'd instantly be one of the three most talented teams in the league with tons of capspace to boot.  Every GM's dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MVPccaffrey said:

10 teams?  I don't see it.

MAYBE Tampa, Washington, Chicago, Denver, Tennessee, maybe.  And most of those would probably rather just draft a new QB since they aren't in contending windows, save Chicago.  

If you can get a 1st rounder, you do it and don't think twice.  Use the free cap space to load up for the years remaining on KA's rookie deal like Philadelphia, Seattle, and SF did this decade.

Cincy, Buffalo, Miami, Dallas, Oakland, LA Chargers, Indy

Theres 7 more teams that could possibly trade for him on top of your 5. Miami wouldn’t have to trade us their 1st rounder next year. Dalton, Josh Allen, Prescott, Carr are all garbage. Rivers is old and Brisett well he’s basically a placeholder. 
 

You’d be stupid to think that there wouldn’t be a bunch of teams having some serious internal discussions if Cam Newton became available in a trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GreensboroPirate said:

It would be very stupid to trade Cam Newton, but you always got the sense Ron Rivera did not like Cam Newton, even tho he saved his job on numerous occasions

-"I'd have taken a shot myself"

-Benched him for not wearing a tie

-Used him like a battering ram, with no concern for concussions or long term damage

The last one is the one that worries me the most about any discussion of Cam returning to form.  His shoulder may well be okay, the foot will heal, but having used him like that for all these years makes me concerned about "what's next?"  And as father time passes, the human body appreciates the task of healing less and less. 

I am hoping what we see when he does come back is not 2015 all over again, but a sustained run of games with nothing other than minor nicks and bumps, an ability to get the ball downfield when called upon, and the ability to move around to allow receivers to get open by scaring the bejeezuz out of defenders about what he might do.....and hopefully does not need to.  Oh, and having learned from watching the last few weeks that there is no rule requiring the snap not be made until 3 seconds or less remains on the play clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Oh come on Scot. This is a QB driven league.

I know you'd prefer to move on but it's not that simple a decision for the guys who actually employ these guys.

How good would Kyle or hurt Cam look without McCaffrey? Allen in reality is pedestrian. These have been team wins not QB wins.

Allen hasn't been the sole reason we've been winning. He himself said that.

Using this way of thinking, Ryan Fitzpatrick is an extremely valuable commodity. After all, he plays quarterback, and quarterback is the most important position :thinking:

And like I asked someone else, are we going to go back and look at every game where a receiver or running back played great or the defense was dominant and subtract those from Cam Newton's win total as well? After all, I'm sure Newton himself would tell you he wasn't the sole reason we were winning.

Bottom Line:.The possibility of Kyle Allen being our quarterback of the future is, for the moment, actually real. By the end of the season, it could be even more real, or it could be totally unreal. No way to know, and I frankly don't care how it turns out as long as it's the best thing for the team.

Independent of how Kyle Allen performs, there is the possibility that Newton comes back and plays well, that he comes back and doesn't play well or that he doesn't come back at all.  It's wide open.

But whatever happens, I don't give a rat's ass about stats, and I don't care who ends up starting. Winning is all that matters.

Who does it doesn't mean jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MVPccaffrey said:

If there's a universe where you could get multiple 1sts for Cam - which almost certainly isn't the case - you do that without thinking.  Combine with the talent we already have, and overnight we'd instantly be one of the three most talented teams in the league with tons of capspace to boot.  Every GM's dream.

Yup but I don’t think you’d get more than a 1st round and maybe a 3rd round right now. Just based off injury history.

It’s a pointless thread. There’s people who wish nothing but ill on Cam, others who will defend him to death, those who just want the team to win, and a few who want the whole world to burn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now, I doubt anybody would give anything of value until we/they see that Cam is healthy.  There are just too many questions.  Somebody could toss out a 3rd or 4th, but that would be a gamble and that might have a contingency as to what we get.  And as others have said, if Cam comes back and is healthy, he is not likely on the trade market, anyway.

I said this a couple of weeks ago, and I think it is still true.  The person whose future Allen's performance has most impacted is Grier, not Cam.

Think back.  If you had told us in August that Cam was going to be out after game 2 until at least the bye week, and we were going to start out 0-2, how many people would have said we would hit the bye at 4-2?  3-3?  Even 2-4?  The knock on our roster, other than a questionable OL was that we had no depth behind Cam Newton.  Grier was drafted to become that depth.

I think we would have had more people answer the above question with 0-6 than 4-2.

Oh, and if I am Cam or any QB and the discussion is trading me to Cleveland or Washington, I just hang it up.  Those are graveyards for QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Using this way of thinking, Ryan Fitzpatrick is an extremely valuable commodity. After all, he plays quarterback, and quarterback is the most important position :thinking:

And like I asked someone else, are we going to go back and look at every game where a receiver or running back played great or the defense was dominant and subtract those from Cam Newton's win total as well? After all, I'm sure Newton himself would tell you he wasn't the sole reason we were winning.

Bottom Line:.The possibility of Kyle Allen being our quarterback of the future is, for the moment, actually real. By the end of the season, it could be even more real, or it could be totally unreal. No way to know, and I frankly don't care how it turns out as long as it's the best thing for the team.

Independent of how Kyle Allen performs, there is the possibility that Newton comes back and plays well, that he comes back and doesn't play well or that he doesn't come back at all.  It's wide open.

But whatever happens, I don't give a rat's ass about stats, and I don't care who ends up starting. Winning is all that matters.

Who does it doesn't mean jack.

Ryan Fitz isn't a franchise QB Cam is, like his win percentage with guys like Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess or not, he IS a franchise QB. To cast a franchise QB away without having a franchise QB is NFL suicide. It won't happen because they want to win now.

If you are anti-Rivera/Cam there are plenty of teams that would take both almost immediately. Tepper could have immediately cleaned house but he didn't. The FO changed dramatically, why not the coaching staff? Because he's a smart guy.

Can the team lean on Kyle Allen if injuries pile up and there's no blocking, receivers are dropping and the game plan in general is questionable at best? I've seen Cam win in spite of all those things. Show some respect.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Ryan Fitz isn't a franchise QB Cam is, like his win percentage with guys like Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess or not, he IS a franchise QB. To cast a franchise QB away without having a franchise QB is NFL suicide. It won't happen because they want to win now.

If you are anti-Rivera/Cam there are plenty of teams that would take both almost immediately. Tepper could have immediately cleaned house but he didn't. The FO changed dramatically, why not the coaching staff? Because he's a smart guy.

Can the team lean on Kyle Allen if injuries pile up and there's no blocking, receivers are dropping and the game plan in general is questionable at best? I've seen Cam win in spite of all those things. Show some respect.

Can Allen do that? Maybe. We don't know yet.

Cam Newton still do that? Again, maybe. We don't really know.

What I do know is that "respect" for past performances doesn't mean jack sh-t. The only thing that matters is how things are right now.

"Respect" is what leads you to do things like offering Jake Delhomme a big extension after the Cardinals playoff game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Would that mean the handful of Cam fans would go with him and leave the Panthers fans here to cheer on this team?  Players come and go, but I cheer for this organization.

A lot of y’all are cheering for anyone not named Cam let’s be honest. We aren’t Cam fans. We recognize that he’s the best QB on the roster and the defense and CMC playing lights out over the past few weeks doesn’t change that. When’s the last time the defense got 7 turnovers in a game? I bet we won that one too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...