Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucs DC said Kyle Allen presented more of a challenge than Cam


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, SmartyHurney said:

Oh poo, better trade the former MVP for a guy averaging 225 yards a game (25th in the league) and has almost no rushing statistics.

Jeremy Igo, the cheerleader for mediocre.

Stats or no stats.... He hasn't lost. Winning is the only thing that matters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mvp2014 said:

Not a knock on Cam.  Hes just not the typical NFL quarterback. In the right system he can be the most dangerous QB in the league(2015).   I still think his accuracy is too limited to carry a team without a threat of a power running game.  

That said, we wouldnt have sniffed the playoffs in 15’ without Cam, that wasnt the implication at all.  

Cam Newton 

Just Last year

 

 

Led the panthers from a Huge deficit in the 2nd half

Where the RBs had a grand total of 29 yards

 

And he went 17-21 in the 2nd half and led the Panthers to a large comeback W..........on the road.......in a tough environment in Philly

 

 

 

Its pretty naive to think that the RBs "carried" cam

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SmartyHurney said:

Oh poo, better trade the former MVP for a guy averaging 225 yards a game (25th in the league) and has almost no rushing statistics.

Jeremy Igo, the cheerleader for mediocre.

In 2011, Cam led the league in passing yards with over 850 yards and an average of 430. We were 0-2.

Allen is averaging 225 and we are 4-0.

So what exactly is your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Puresteel55 said:

In 2011, Cam led the league in passing yards with over 850 yards and an average of 430. We were 0-2.

Allen is averaging 225 and we are 4-0.

So what exactly is your point?

The 2011 team was 2-14 the year prior...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Is it possible Todd Bowels said this because he wants Cam out of the division because he’s actually a really good QB? Typical buttered up butthole coach speak 

Possible. I considered it myself, but I’m kinda inclined to think NFL coordinators know that opposing team officials public comments will be taken with a grain of salt by any team’s decision makers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SmartyHurney said:

Two things. 7 turnovers, and Daley.

If that Tampa team from week 2 played even a hobbled Cam with the offensive line from this week, as well as Daley at LT and it's an easy win.

I was thinking about that too. Barrett had such a huge game the first time around, and was non existent Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Is it possible Todd Bowels said this because he wants Cam out of the division because he’s actually a really good QB? Typical buttered up butthole coach speak 

Not likely. Pre-production meetings are closed door and usually the stuff that is said never makes it public. I’m actually curious if Rich was actually authorized to go public with this and attach Bowles name to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Is it possible Todd Bowels said this because he wants Cam out of the division because he’s actually a really good QB? Typical buttered up butthole coach speak 

I don’t think it is overly complicated. 

There is 8 years worth of film on Newton and Bowles has prepare for and played Cam numerous times. 

There are 5 games of film on Allen.  Which we have won and is doing new stuff every week still. 

so it really is simple.   He knows Cam well.  Makes game planning easy.  Maybe the plan gets executed well maybe it doesn’t but teams know Newton and what works.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I don’t think it is overly complicated. 

There is 8 years worth of film on Newton and Bowles has prepare for and played Cam numerous times. 

There are 5 games of film on Allen.  Which we have won and is doing new stuff every week still. 

so it really is simple.   He knows Cam well.  Makes game planning easy.  Maybe the plan gets executed well maybe it doesn’t but teams know Newton and what works.  

pretty simple, but they rather put their own spin on it smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If my reply comes off argumentative, that is not my intention so please don’t take it as such.  You said one word, probably subconsciously, in your post that immediately disqualifies him from being a QB in the NFL. You actually said it twice. Kid. It’s exactly how you see him, and exactly how the rest of the entire NFL sees him as well.  Yes, he is a kid, he looks and acts like a kid and that exactly IS the problem. The NFL is for grown ass men. Period. Hell, our kicker looks like he collects ‘taxes’ as a side hustle. These are straight dudes. Men.  Nothing in his persona changed from last year to this.  Nothing in his physical stature. Nothing. He has shown 0 development. 0. And he disrespects the entire organization, talking video games and Netflix in the offseason. Bro. Really. My man Chuba is busting his ass to look good for his second contract. Set himself up for life. How many RBs make it to even sign contract #3? First 2 games he has to run in to a brick wall continuously because Netflix can’t even get it over the LOS.  He’s a kid who pulled off the biggest heist in world history. He looks happier on the sideline goofing around than he ever has looked on the field. It’s time to cut bait. 
    • I hear you and I can imagine it's frustrating as a fan, but UNC-CH leaving the ACC would be throwing away over a century of history. It would really suck if y'all, or Clemson, or any of the other remaining charter members leave. I still think it sucks that Maryland left as well. Feels so wrong not having that rivalry anymore. Maryland fuging hated us and I loved it. Who's Maryland's rival now in the big 10? Rutgers? lol. Also, I think that the Heels are more likely to be Kentucky 2.0 than you are to get serious about football upon joining the SEC. Both UNC (and also Duke's) administrations seem very stuck in their ways with sticking to their ways and remaining basketball powerhouses. I do wish we could see NC teams actually competing in my favorite sport sometimes but alas. I personally value keeping our history intact over trying to become top flight CFB programs because nowadays it's just a pay to win sport anyways. Even if UNC-CH got serious I doubt they could compete with that Texas oil money, or that Oregon nike money, or that USC rich kid money. That's all top level college football really is anymore. You're either an established blue blood or you're willing to waste tons of money that could be spent on education rather than football. 
    • Maybe a move to the SEC forces UNC to be more serious about football?   I mean we should be making noise in the weak ACC and we can't even do that. How is Duke better than UNC in football right now? It's honestly sad and pathetic.   It doesn't matter if we get another great QB as you said a QB doesn't mean you have a great roster. A QB can only do so much. We lack elite guys in the trenches. That's how you build a program. It starts up front.
×
×
  • Create New...