Kyle Allen's numbers

[philit99]

Check all the stats you want to, but how much time has he spent behind or being down? His yards passing per game would go up tremendously if he had to pass. We are passing to compliment the run. Allen is doing a great job, not sure he could win us the Super Bowl, but I’m not sure Cam could either.

[RelaxImaPro]

1 minute ago, lightsout said:

Got a source?

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/splits/_/id/3115293/kyle-allen

[Peppers90 NC]

3 hours ago, stbugs said:

Who cares? In two of the games we had massive leads. Winston threw for 400 yards. Did he have a good game or did he have to chuck it all second half to try and stay in the game?

He gave you yards per attempt, where he’s 7th. That’s pretty good since he’s been labeled as just checking down all the time. 

Cam averages 232 yards per game not sure what the point the guy is trying to make other than he is getting his rocks off right now arguing because he has nothing better to do. Enjoying a win is too painful because his guy isn't back there.

[RelaxImaPro]

Here's another interesting one, when Kyle Allen has been behind in games...

[lightsout]

Just now, RelaxImaPro said:

Here's another interesting one, when Kyle Allen has been behind in games...

Best part...that's at least 3 drives. lol. Statistically...he is BETTER when behind or tied than he is with a lead. And almost half his passing attempts have come behind or down. This last game literally pushed the disparity over the edge because it was pretty split.

[steven8989]

4 hours ago, SmartyHurney said:

Fumbles per game? Yards per game? Touchdowns per game? Rating vs Blitz?

How about how how many games in a row without an interception? Cam maybe two games in a row. Hey by the way all of those stats u throw up, he is undefeated!

[ecu88]

13 minutes ago, RelaxImaPro said:

Here's another interesting one, when Kyle Allen has been behind in games...

Ice in his veins

[Peppers90 NC]

3 hours ago, Krovvy said:

Whoa, that is a lot of YAC this year. The difference from having two massive tight ends playing receiver, and guys that can actually shake a defender.

Yea it's nice to see our receivers do what they can do. Totally helps to have the ball hit them in stride ahead of them occasionally rather than behind or up high or anything that slows them down to catch it. 

[ncfan]

21 minutes ago, RelaxImaPro said:

Here's another interesting one, when Kyle Allen has been behind in games...

Only 13 attempts in 4 games

 

Pretty much proves he hasnt been down more than probably 2 drives over 4 games and riding the coats of the run game and D

 

Cam was 17-21 in the entire 2nd half last year on a comeback vs Philly in ONE GAME.  We only got 29 yards rushing from the RBs from that game to.

 

 

Thay was last year, ONE season ago

[steven8989]

3 hours ago, lightsout said:

And to be fair, there were dropped passes and a stout Bucs run D that didn't allow us to cash in. Not fair to pin it all on Allen not being able to drive us on those short fields. Not to say he's faultless, but you're building a bit of a strawman to knock down.

Yeah Wright dropped two easy balls that makes those drives keep going and more points. 

[RelaxImaPro]

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Only 13 attempts in 4 games

 

Pretty much proves he hasnt been down more than probably 2 drives over 4 games and riding the coats of the run game and D

13 attempts in 4 games.  Completed 12 of those 13 attempts for 3 TDs and they were over 13 YPC on average... that kinda at least has a good bit to do with why he hasn't been down a lot, because he's played his best football by far the times he has to take the lead back.

[Krovvy]

Isn't that behind statistic a little fudged from his early fumbles leading to quick points from the opponent? 

[Mr. Scot]

10 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Only 13 attempts in 4 games

Pretty much proves he hasnt been down more than probably 2 drives over 4 games and riding the coats of the run game and D

Why do people talk about this as if not being behind on the scoreboard is a bad thing?

It kinda means you're, you know, winning the game.

[mav1234]

 

5 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Isn't that behind statistic a little fudged from his early fumbles leading to quick points from the opponent? 

No... The only fumble I can see of his that lead to opponent points putting them ahead was vs Arizona... and on the opening drive vs Arizona, but they had a 5 minute drive after Allen's fumble..  Def. not a quick score.