Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Jake theory


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

If the ball's not gonna get there fast, it needs to get there accurately, and Jake has just looked awful in that regard this season.

His passes are terribly inaccurate for an NFL level QB, even in the short range... where arm strength doesn't mean much at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, we can come out and theorize all we want, but the point is Jake can NOT be a consistent winner. Our system needs an accurate game managing mistake free quarterback who can get the ball down field to Smith when necessary. Jake is not that. Even if we win today, even if we win next week. Jake will eventually kill this season whether it be a playoff game or the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, we can come out and theorize all we want, but the point is Jake can NOT be a consistent winner. Our system needs an accurate game managing mistake free quarterback who can get the ball down field to Smith when necessary. Jake is not that. Even if we win today, even if we win next week. Jake will eventually kill this season whether it be a playoff game or the rest of the season.

We don't even need mistake free. All we need is someone who can hand the ball off and get it to the open receiver 90% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tape does not lie. NFC Playbook and several other shows have dissected Delhomme's passing plays, his missing the open receivers, his slow delivery, and his inability to hit the passing window at the time he needs to hit it, hence causing interceptions, tipped balls and the rest.

Blaming the receivers is not correct. Are they perfect 'no', but they would have to be 12' tall with a 10' veritical jump and 10' horizontal reach, or contortionists to catch half of the balls Delhomme throws.

Delhomme's arm is gone, that arm has been going for awhile and our FO ignored it; so, here we are, with people posting to this board trying to come up with JFK like conspiracy theories as to what is wrong with the team. Put Joe Flacco, or Carson Palmer, or even Chad Henne on this team and see if there is a difference, you know, a QB who can complete a pass in the 4 seconds it takes to complete one.

Delhomme did good things for this franchise for many years; but, those years are gone. We should thank him as fans for all he has done. He should take his $20 million and ride into the sunset. It is not his fault that the GM, the Coach, and of course, the owner, agreed to do what they did for him.

Let me say too, even if by some miracle the Panthers win Sunday, even if Delhomme has one of those rare performances, that are becoming rarer, this is his last year, and needs to be, for the good of the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, Jake throttled back and didn't take chances because he didn't trust his arm after the surgery.

After the Oakland and Arizona debacles last year, he was determined to prove everyone wrong, taking more chances this year. Moose and Smitty no longer bail him out on some of his throws (we've seen each tip balls and not try to break up interceptions) and Smitty is no longer happy in the offense because it's so run-heavy (in theory). So Jake is out there trying to do too much by himself.

If the team gives him a gameplan similar to the one they used at Atlanta, the Panthers will beat the Cardinals. And Jake will look good as they do it.

don't make the mistake of blaming jake's bad games on the WR's not making plays on poorly thrown balls and not bailing him out. jake's problems are mostly his own fault. the fact that it is even MENTIONED that he needs to be "bailed out" by the WR's says alot about his play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delhomme's arm is gone, that arm has been going for awhile and our FO ignored it;

I don't think that's entirely true. David Carr was an attempt to add young talent behind Jake. Bad decision in hindsight sure but at the time many people thought he would replace Jake that season. Hardly ignoring the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that's entirely true. David Carr was an attempt to add young talent behind Jake. Bad decision in hindsight sure but at the time many people thought he would replace Jake that season. Hardly ignoring the position.

I think David Carr actually got worse in his time here.

Hmmmm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...