Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TV broadcast for Sunday's game in London?

dpm0409

By dpm0409,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

dpm0409 Enthusiast

dpm0409

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, dave-o said:

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=letmegooglethatforyou

 

1. let me google that for you, meaning, "Holy fuging poo. Google that yourself. Don't fuging ask me."

Appreciate your useless advice, but already did that and thought I'd get some input from a message board....where people talk about the Panthers....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Veteran

Captroop

Posted
Posted

According to the Bucc's site (sorry) it will be broadcast on NFL Network and Sunday Ticket.

Quote

NFL Network

MOR-TV (locally)

Digital 32.1

Spectrum 12

FIOS 512

DIRECTV 32

COMCAST 437

Live Stream

The stream is available through Yahoo Sports and the Buccaneers Official App.

https://www.buccaneers.com/news/bucs-panthers-how-to-watch-view-stream-listen-game-week-6-2019

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBiii Newbie

SBiii

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

Appreciate it, I'd assume it would be available on Sunday Ticket as well (at least I hope).

There are high quality streams of every NFL game available on reddit weekly.  That said, be careful because there are some sketchy links in there from time to time, I always use an Apple iPad due to the rigorous built-in security features.  MLB, boxing, NBA, etc...all available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jessicasmith0
      Does JetBlue have free cancellation?

      By jessicasmith0 · Posted

      https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...