Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norv on CMC: "We can't have him have a 37 touch load over time. Analytics guys saying throw it to him more."


ncfan

Recommended Posts

I get the Norv criticism obviously. But at what point do you ask what level of involvement Rivera has in all this? Why are we seeing the same distinct brand of stubbornness in use of personnel through two different offensive coordinators?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I get the Norv criticism obviously. But at what point do you ask what level of involvement Rivera has in all this? Why are we seeing the same distinct brand of stubbornness in use of personnel through two different offensive coordinators?

Cause we’re...not...? We pretty consistently split carries under Shula. We ran a lot of 2 TE sets under Chud. There are drastically different offensive philosophies/personnel groupings under our three different coordinators so I’m not sure how you suggest that Rivera is behind it.

Seems like he gives his offensive coordinators control and free reign to run the offense however they see fit. Which isn’t the worst thing in the world for a defensive guy...I’d rather that, than him meddling with the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

bro even has a WR who's played running back at his disposal and can't figure it out lol

If you mean Samuel, he does get a significant amount of touches or targets in the passing game.  I saw that him, Moore, and CMC are tied for the lead in number of targets.  But Samuel gets a higher percentage of deep throws.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • they are two totally different prospects, I am not going to scream if he is the guy but just know we would be way over drafting him at 8
    • Listen to this dude, he breaks everything down starting with Cam and Teppers start.  Its patented insanity what they did up until this point.  Most of us on here have watched football for years if not decades and there is not one of us that would have done what this poverty ass franchise has done the last 6 years.  So yeah its well within reason to say the huddle could have easily, fuging easily put this team in a better spot then tepper/fitt/morgan.  Maybe morgan turns it around with this draft, he has the draft capital to do it, but come on with nicole and dave still giving input you just know we are fuged 6 ways from sunday.  Overthinking players due to their physical traits and picking interview favorites is clear insanity at this point.    
    • I still never understand the back the team no matter what the results have been. There is no doubt in my mind that if the huddle had run the drafts the past 7 years, we would have a much better team right now and likely challenged for our division the past few years. The drafts have been awful, period and there’s probably 10 consensus guys we were right on that would all have been improvements on the current roster.
×
×
  • Create New...