Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IR Trade rule?


Obeg

Recommended Posts

I believe you actually can now (there was a change sometime back) but the biggest rule governing that kind of trade is that you have to find somebody who's dumb enough to give something up for a guy who was injured badly enough to be designated "out for the year".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I’m so confused why people keep bringing up cut gano while he was on IR.... he isn’t getting paid his active game bonus, and it would result in 5.7mil of dead cap. 

I'm ignorant on all of the cans and cannots ... but my thought was we have what may be a healthy, good kicker on IR.  There are several desperate teams in need of a kicker.. Pats being one of these.  If we can trade off the IR OR use this fact to entice Gano to be generous in the injury settlement - we can get out from under some, if not all of what you mention.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Obeg said:

I'm ignorant on all of the cans and cannots ... but my thought was we have what may be a healthy, good kicker on IR.  There are several desperate teams in need of a kicker.. Pats being one of these.  If we can trade off the IR OR use this fact to entice Gano to be generous in the injury settlement - we can get out from under some, if not all of what you mention.

 

  Even if that was to happen, it would save only a couple 100K at best. The 5.6M isn’t going anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes no sense to cut Gano right now. He doesn’t count against the 53 man roster, and while on IR hits our cap for $3.7 mil. 

Of we cut him, he would instantly hit cap for $5.6 mil. We can’t injury settle/negotiate out of that $5.6m. It is money we have already paid him via signing bonus.

If we trade him, it would only make sense if the other team enticed us with good enough picks, which isn’t likely for a kicker. 

If Slye stays on his current trajectory, you cut or trade Gano after this season, and his dead cap number drops enough to where we would save about $1.5 mil by cutting him (cap number of $4.5 and dead money of $3 nets $1.5 savings).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...