Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One Franchise tag.....Shaq and Bradberry who do you choose?


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I created a thread on this before, but I figured it’s worth bringing up again. Both Shaq (25 years old) and Bradberry (26 years old) are free agents after this year. Shaq allows our defense to do so many things (he covered a wide receiver just like a cb last week along with his blitz ability) and is having an outstanding year so far. Bradberry is becoming one of the most consistent young CB’s in the game. NFL Teams would love to sign either one so which would to pick to get the tag? Do you believe we sign both to an extension or let one walk because of the cost? 

I think we messed up not signing at least one to an extension this past offseason, as the price continues to go up for both. 

Quote below from @PantherBrew post:

For too long, Shaq Thompson played behind Thomas Davis and was never utilized as an every down defender. Then Thomas Davis went to Los Angeles, and they finally gave him the keys to the 2004 Subaru Outback. He pairs perfectly with Kuechly. The transition has been seamless from one administration to the other. Thompson had 12 tackles, 7 solo, 1 sack, 1 tackle for a loss, 1 pass defensed, and 1 quarterback hit in this one to add to the other 19 solo tackles, 2 tackles for a loss, 1 quarterback hit, and 1 pass defensed he’s already made. This is the best game I’ve remembered seeing Thompson play. I’ll have to check and see what Pro Fartball Focus says first though.
Thompson blitzed well in this game when they decided to bring him. He sacks Watson on this second and twelve blitz. They bring three on the right. It’s big on big. Thompson v. Mancz. He tosses him like a Reggie White pass rush, and leaps to take away Watson’s ability to throw it at the feet of the out route. Also, Kuechly knows exactly where Watson wants to go with the ball. Once again, the Panthers are funneling Houston and taking away their outs.

Bradberry:

B. Cooks 2 rec 39yds

M. Evans 4 rec  61yds

L. Fitzgerlad 5 rec 36 yds

D. Hopkins 5 rec 41 yds

From @ellis:

 

 

 

A2618F2C-3BD4-4131-A239-F919B0C971F0.jpeg

5E921503-08B7-441A-BADA-1BED41246A49.jpeg

We have more than enough money next year to keep both guys

 

and were you watching panther nation podcast? Bet u were

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Bradberry easily.  You can find a new young LB in the draft all the time. 

No you really dont. Took us forever to finally have Shaq perform like this. Look at this year’s guys. Devin Bush is doing okay, not elite. Devin White hasnt shown a thing and is hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CB and LB franchise tags were nearly equal going into this season ($1M difference). With that being the case, I'd franchise Bradberry, but only until I got Shaq's deal worked out so that he wasn't lost to free agency if negotiations take awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Forty-Eight said:

We have more than enough money next year to keep both guys

 

and were you watching panther nation podcast? Bet u were

I was not.....but 34 million next year and a ton of free agents, many currently starting for us. It may not be as easy as you believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest problem with Shaq, is he got paid well above his worth this year. Thankfully at least he has played above expectations. If he made $9M this year, would he settle for say a $7M average with is more in line with his position? Regardless, Bradberry has to be the first priority, upper tier CBs are much harder to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I created a thread on this before, but I figured it’s worth bringing up again. Both Shaq (25 years old) and Bradberry (26 years old) are free agents after this year. Shaq allows our defense to do so many things (he covered a wide receiver just like a cb last week along with his blitz ability) and is having an outstanding year so far. Bradberry is becoming one of the most consistent young CB’s in the game. NFL Teams would love to sign either one so which would to pick to get the tag? Do you believe we sign both to an extension or let one walk because of the cost? 

I think we messed up not signing at least one to an extension this past offseason, as the price continues to go up for both. 

Quote below from @PantherBrew post:

For too long, Shaq Thompson played behind Thomas Davis and was never utilized as an every down defender. Then Thomas Davis went to Los Angeles, and they finally gave him the keys to the 2004 Subaru Outback. He pairs perfectly with Kuechly. The transition has been seamless from one administration to the other. Thompson had 12 tackles, 7 solo, 1 sack, 1 tackle for a loss, 1 pass defensed, and 1 quarterback hit in this one to add to the other 19 solo tackles, 2 tackles for a loss, 1 quarterback hit, and 1 pass defensed he’s already made. This is the best game I’ve remembered seeing Thompson play. I’ll have to check and see what Pro Fartball Focus says first though.
Thompson blitzed well in this game when they decided to bring him. He sacks Watson on this second and twelve blitz. They bring three on the right. It’s big on big. Thompson v. Mancz. He tosses him like a Reggie White pass rush, and leaps to take away Watson’s ability to throw it at the feet of the out route. Also, Kuechly knows exactly where Watson wants to go with the ball. Once again, the Panthers are funneling Houston and taking away their outs.

Bradberry:

B. Cooks 2 rec 39yds

M. Evans 4 rec  61yds

L. Fitzgerlad 5 rec 36 yds

D. Hopkins 5 rec 41 yds

From @ellis:

 

 

 

A2618F2C-3BD4-4131-A239-F919B0C971F0.jpeg

5E921503-08B7-441A-BADA-1BED41246A49.jpeg

No reason in messing around sign both....attempt to get them on team friendly deals explaining how we want to keep this entire team in tact for years to come! I think they will both take a few mil less then value to stay here. If you offer long contracts it should help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt62881 said:

No reason in messing around sign both....attempt to get them on team friendly deals explaining how we want to keep this entire team in tact for years to come! I think they will both take a few mil less then value to stay here. If you offer long contracts it should help!

There is a little bit less than a zero % chance this would happen.

Bradberry for sure should have been signed in the offseason, that is a Hurney blunder.  Now both he and Shaq will be quite a bit more expensive, and are likely licking their chops for free agency.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Biggest problem with Shaq, is he got paid well above his worth this year. Thankfully at least he has played above expectations. If he made $9M this year, would he settle for say a $7M average with is more in line with his position? Regardless, Bradberry has to be the first priority, upper tier CBs are much harder to find.

Shaq is making peanuts for what he his performing right now. Kwon Alexander is making 13.5m a year. And Mosley is making 17m. What is Shaq now? An OLB of MLB? Man will get paid whether it’s us or someone else. He deserves it by playing like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...