Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which of these stat lines is better?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Obviously Allen’s is better but it’s really pointless to compare the two, the teams around them were completely different, the opponents were completely different, the overall situations were completely different and it’s a tiny sample size. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

QB A: 72 of 118 (61.0% completion), 1,033 yards, 3 TDs, 5 interceptions; 23 rushes for 100 yards, 4 TDs, 2 fumbles, 0-3

QB B: 49 of 79 (62% completion), 564 yards, 3 TDs, 2 interceptions; 3 rushes for 5 yards, 2-1

2-1 beats 0-3 every time. matt moore owns

Haha...decent post 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bartin said:

QB B is actually...Cam Newton's first three road starts”

The two games you cited were home games so they wouldn’t be a part of the stat the OP put up.

Oh, gotcha.

Makes this thread even more pointless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well since wins are a team stat not an individual player’s stat you can drop that from the comparison. It’s close. I’ll take an interception over a lost fumble since an interception usually puts them much further down the field.
 

Hard to really compare since one had only one WR that should even be in the NFL and an ok defense and the other has a comparatively stacked supporting offensive cast and a defense playing lights out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, EgoDogg said:

Look at the teams around those players, too.

2011 was right after going 2-14. Legedu Naanee was also our #2 receiver. This thread is one of the most cherry-picked threads I've seen.

Not really. I'm not saying Kyle Allen is better than Cam, no one is. Only insecure Cam fanboys are thinking other people are saying that. I'm just sick of people saying Kyle Allen is just Matt Moore when eyeball test and his stats show he's clearly much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GOOGLE JIM BOB COOTER said:

chris weinke went 1-2 in his first 3 games. the record speaks for itself. 1-2 > 0-3 and let me tell you something those records sure were reflective of individual impact and predictive of future success/failure

Another insecure child. No one is saying Kyle Allen is having a better start to his career than Cam Newton. Just that the insecure Camboys that are trying to poo-poo Kyle Allen's stats should see they compare very favorably to Cam's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Not really. I'm not saying Kyle Allen is better than Cam, no one is. Only insecure Cam fanboys are thinking other people are saying that. I'm just sick of people saying Kyle Allen is just Matt Moore when eyeball test and his stats show he's clearly much more.

The truth is you can't anoint him or crucify him after 3 starts. He's done everything you can ask for him as a passer filling in for Cam. He hasn't made any bad decisions throwing and his biggest issue is fumbling, which can be corrected a lot easier than reading defenses. I'm saying just because he had more success (with a better supporting cast) than Cam did in his first 3 road starts doesn't mean squat for what type of player he'll be long-term, and as more tape is available.

I don't think this needs saying, but I will anyways. I absolutely love being confident in having a backup like Kyle Allen. I haven't had faith in a backup QB coming in the game for a LONG time. I don't have an opinion on how he'll be long term. I'm not saying he'll be the next Brady or the next Weinke. He's going to be the next Kyle Allen, and it's very promising what he's shown so far. But I stand by my initial statement that those comparisons don't mean anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Not really. I'm not saying Kyle Allen is better than Cam, no one is. Only insecure Cam fanboys are thinking other people are saying that. I'm just sick of people saying Kyle Allen is just Matt Moore when eyeball test and his stats show he's clearly much more.

I mean....for calling out "insecure Cam fanboys"......you did start this thread, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...