Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Current Carolina-Houston Stats

DaveThePanther2008

By DaveThePanther2008,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

Carolina

Total Defense (YPG) 4th YPG   

(Passing Defense 2nd 166 ypg Rushing Defense 26th 129 ypg) 

Total Offense (YPG) 11th 369 YPG   

(Passing Offense 14th 256 ypg Rushing Offense 11th 113 ypg) 

Houston

Total Defense (YPG) 23rd YPG   

(Passing Defense 25th 277 ypg Rushing Defense 15th 108 ypg)

Total Offense (YPG) 18th 351 YPG   

(Passing Offense 24th 236 ypg Rushing Offense 10th 117 ypg)

Interesting Notes. 

CMC is 2nd behind Davin Cook for rushing yards

Our passing and rushing offense are higher than our overall average.  This tells me we are more balanced offensively than most teams.

Our poorest stat Rushing Defense 26th.  Not typical of a Rivera team and I expect this to improve.

Rushing Offenses are neck and neck. Houston 10 we're 11.

I think we are more explosive with a Healthy Allen than an injured Cam (obviously) So I expect our offensive stats to improve and put us in the top 10 within a couple of weeks.

Based on statistics we should be in this game.  Their defense front can be scary and cause some problems but overall defense is not that good. 

I see no reason why we can't or shouldn't win this game.

VIA CBS SPORTS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...