Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

James Bradberry: Playing at a high-level.


ellis

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ellis said:

He’s not getting a lot of targets. But when he does, he’s maximizing every snap. That’s what I am impressed by the most. Now that Jackson’s put up some good tape, opponents have to reconsider their options a bit. 

I expect numerous double moves from Fuller come Sunday. I bet they try and recreate the blown coverage where Donte bit and tried to jump the route leaving the guy wide open down the sideline only to drop it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s true, double move is a good idea. The problem with that, from Houston’s perspective, is they’re allowing pressure on nearly 40% of all pass plays. That’s the worst in the league. I’m sure O’Brien will scheme up, because that’s what he learned how to do under BB. Where they seem to be weakest is on the interior, which could mean a big day if 93 and 99 are in there together. No Lamar Miller, which has hurt their screen game and pass pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Sometimes I get confused as to what site I’m on

It’s my Twitter.  My site: No ads. No subscriptions. I’m just here sharing information.  I’m not driving for subscribers, or profit, or even followers.

But if it bothers people, I won’t do it. 

Just trying to help drive the conversations along for this place. Again, no big deal. I can stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ellis said:

It’s a free site. No ads. No subscriptions. I’m just here sharing information. But if it bothers people, I won’t do it.

Lots of people on here don’t like any positive coverage of the team so they can stay inside their bubble and talk about how we’re the worst team in the NFL.

The rest of us appreciate what you do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we’re at it, I wanna personally thank Jeremy for giving me an opportunity to share some free content with you guys. I haven’t met the guy, and I don’t know him personally, but this is a great place and he’s done a tremendous job over the years. Props.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradberry is as solid and consistent as they come. He's not going to make many spectacular plays but he's not going to make many spectacularly awful plays either. He just quietly does his job. Dante is the polar opposite on the other side. He's going to make a lot of splash plays, but he's a riverboat gambler at CB and he's going to get burned badly occasionally because of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...