Ab needs some help

[Toomers]

16 minutes ago, rodeo said:

he absolutely has a point, though. robert kraft was literally busted on camera "engaging" with sex trafficking victims and faced no consequences from the league, meanwhile AB was cut (by Kraft) over thusfar unproven accusations.

ben is literally nicknamed rapelisburger and received very minor punishment by his team.

there's a disparity.

  If unproven is the standard, why compare it to Ben? What was proven there? Or an old single guy getting a happy ending? 

  Why not mention Joe Mixon? Or Leonard Little or Dontae Stallworth? They literally killed people. Or do they not fit the agenda? 

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

  If unproven is the standard, why compare it to Ben? What was proven there? Or an old single guy getting a happy ending? 

  Why not mention Joe Mixon? Or Leonard Little or Dontae Stallworth? They literally killed people. Or do they not fit the agenda? 

What's the agenda?

[rodeo]

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  If unproven is the standard, why compare it to Ben? What was proven there?

was he released?

[rodeo]

11 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

There was no evidence of this FYI. He got a rub and tug.

the owner of the establishment was a sex trafficker. it's pretty doubtful he got a rub and tug from the 1 voluntary non-trafficking victim who just loves giving old men handjobs for fun.

[Mr. Scot]

Roethlisberger technically did suffer consequences, though I and many others think they weren't anywhere close to severe enough. The league may have felt they'd lose a legal challenge if they imposed a harsher punishment.

Kraft, on the other hand, ended up off the hook legally speaking. But the league has made clear that you can still punish players even if they suffer no legal consequence. They just chose to go no further.

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

was he released?

 What was proven that he did to deserve it. If ABs allegations are unproven, so are Ben’s. Can’t have it both ways. 

[rodeo]

Just now, Toomers said:

 What was proven that he did to deserve it. If ABs allegations are unproven, so are Ben’s. Can’t have it both ways. 

...AB was released. Ben was not. both over unproven allegations. you're trying to have it both ways.

[Mr. Scot]

Also, just to be clear, cutting a player is a team decision, not a league decision.

[Toomers]

5 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

What's the agenda?

  Seems to be to justify ABs actions by bringing up only “specific” players or owners who either are irrelevant to the situation, or are not given the same “benefit of the doubt” that AB is. 

[CatTower]

The guy had about 40 million given to him and taken back over the course of a couple weeks for accusations that may or not be true.  I think a lot of people would be a little unsettled in that situation.  

[ncfan]

Think some people are completely missing it

"4 games for Big Ben Crazy world I'm done with it."

 

"Someone legit needs to get to Antonio Brown"

"May be alarms"

 

No matter what side you standif you thunk people are not being fair to him.  Or you think he needs to be locked up.

 

The dude needs some mental help Now.

[Toomers]

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

...AB was released. Ben was not. both over unproven allegations. you're trying to have it both ways.

  I didn’t realize Ben played for the Patriots. The NFL didn’t cut him. NE did. 

[CatTower]

3 minutes ago, rodeo said:

...AB was released. Ben was not. both over unproven allegations. you're trying to have it both ways.

Ben's case was many years ago.  A lot has changed in the league since then.  I'm pretty certain any player facing similar allegations today would face much harsher punishment.

[Mr. Scot]

3 minutes ago, ncfan said:

No matter what side you stand if you think people are not being fair to him.  Or you think he needs to be locked up.

The dude needs some mental help Now.

That's what Josina Anderson is saying, and I think she's right.