Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can We Talk About Boger


Mol3m4n

Recommended Posts

I never want to blame a loss on the officials. I understand the issues with Cam, Turner, and Ron. However, how many times does that make that we've had Boger's crew and they've screwed us over? Some of the worst officiating I've ever seen tonight. Almost matches the super bowl or the 2013 49ers game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the reality is they're not going to do poo. the officiating is unionized and they're protected from all criticism and held to a ridiculously low standard and given replays to review their poo calls. It's astonishing how few times I've felt that they've come out of a review and confirmed a call instead of some play stands as called poo. Almost as if the reviews are just a waste of time and just there to help sandbag and give people an outlet to excuse their no-calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toolbox said:

The guy is a worthless f.uck

 Name a ref that isn't, they're all terrible.  Every game I get to thinking that this guy is the worst, then without fail the next game comes along and I see who is officiating and think, gee we'd be better off with the shitty ref from last game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ratzer said:

Do not search for excuses... The Panthers did way worse than the officiating crew... Lol we lost to the Bucs and our QB1 hasnt scored a TD in 8 quarters of football. Keep that in mind. 

No excuses here. Just complaining about a terrible referee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mol3m4n said:

I never want to blame a loss on the officials. I understand the issues with Cam, Turner, and Ron. However, how many times does that make that we've had Boger's crew and they've screwed us over? Some of the worst officiating I've ever seen tonight. Almost matches the super bowl or the 2013 49ers game. 

The refs have given away more pts to the opposing teams then we have lost by, outside of the oline this team is much better then 0 and 2!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...