Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The “Newton/Rivera” Panthers vs. reigning AFC/NFC champs


ellis

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ellis said:

Not a bad track record for this regime. As you can see, the quarterback deserves a lot of credit for that. 

 

When does the quarterback not get most of the credit good or bad? I love how folks act as if every head coach's success isn't highly tied to the success of their quarterback. Show me one successful coach who has consistently had great success with crappy quarterbacks.  Of course the team's success is highly influenced by play of the quarterback. Sure you could argue the Ravens won the Superbowl without a good quarterback a few decades ago. But would even Belicheck be great without Brady?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, panthers55 said:

When does the quarterback not get most of the credit good or bad? I love how folks act as if every head coach's success isn't highly tied to the success of their quarterback. Show me one successful coach who has consistently had great success with crappy quarterbacks.  Of course the team's success is highly influenced by play of the quarterback. Sure you could argue the Ravens won the Superbowl without a good quarterback a few decades ago. But would even Belicheck be great without Brady?

 

Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl. Kerry Collins played in a super bowl. Rex Grossman played in a super bowl

I’m not really disagreeing with you, but it certainly happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Trent Dilfer won a Super Bowl. Kerry Collins played in a super bowl. Rex Grossman played in a super bowl

I’m not really disagreeing with you, but it certainly happens

And only Dilfer won a Super Bowl with arguably the best defense of all time. But that doesn't address my post. Again what coach has had consistent success with crappy quarterbacks. You pointed out three examples where a coach has ridden a great defense one year with a crappy quarterback although you could argue Collins didn't suck for the Giants. So again  what coach has had consistent success without a good to great.quarterback. the answer is still none. Of course quarterbacks for winning teams have to make scoring drives in the 4th quarter, that is why they get paid 20-30 million a year. If you can't make game winning drives in the 4th quarter when it counts you get replaced by someone who can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, panthers55 said:

And only Dilfer won a Super Bowl with arguably the best defense of all time. But that doesn't address my post. Again what coach has had consistent success with crappy quarterbacks. You pointed out three examples where a coach has ridden a great defense one year with a crappy quarterback although you could argue Collins didn't suck for the Giants. So again  what coach has had consistent success without a good to great.quarterback. the answer is still none. Of course quarterbacks for winning teams have to make scoring drives in the 4th quarter, that is why they get paid 20-30 million a year. If you can't make game winning drives in the 4th quarter when it counts you get replaced by someone who can.

In the last 20 years or so, none.  Historically, Joe Gibbs won three superbowls with average/slightly above average qb's, but the rules were different then.  

But I do agree with you, the Ron can't win without Cam narrative is ridiculous.  Bill B has a losing record without Tom Brady.  Bill Walsh never won a Superbowl without Montana.  Good players need good coaches and vice versa.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...