Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Film Room: Rams 3rd Down Offense


ellis

Recommended Posts

There’s a lot to unpack when scouting out an opponent. We’re trying to examine a little bit of the Rams at a time here this week. Today, we look at their third down offense. It was an issue in the Super Bowl, as has been well-chronicled. 

What did the Pats do? Does Carolina have the necessary pieces to replicate it? Here’s a closer look from our perspective.

 

Link: https://onepantherplace.com/?p=2651

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you’ll see a different looking Rams team, of course. Gurley should more of a factor. They ran a ton of screen game with him in 2017. He’s a threat there. Cooper Kupp missed the Super Bowl. He’s back. 

They don’t have the most explosive playmakers at tight end. It’s a solid group, but nothing that overly-concerns me. That should free up 59 to bracket Kupp in coverage. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ellis said:

I think you’ll see a different looking Rams team, of course. Gurley should more of a factor. They ran a ton of screen game with him in 2017. He’s a threat there. Cooper Kupp missed the Super Bowl. He’s back. 

They don’t have the most explosive playmakers at tight end. It’s a solid group, but nothing that overly-concerns me. That should free up 59 to bracket Kupp in coverage. 

 

Do we want Kuechly on Kupp? I'd think a nickel would make more sense. Otherwise we'd have a situation similar to the Bill's preseason game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Do we want Kuechly on Kupp? I'd think a nickel would make more sense. Otherwise we'd have a situation similar to the Bill's preseason game

I think he can help in coverage underneath. I didn’t mean to assert that he would be playing man coverage against a wide receiver all game. That’s not optimal utilization for 59.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Something else the Pats did was they didn’t line up early and allow McVay to tell Goff what to do. I hope Ron knows this and takes advantage like Bill did. Goff is not great at reading defenses

That’s a very good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by V   https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24byhttps://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24byhttps://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by
    • It's been a tradition of mine in FF I ignore the name of the RB and draft them based on the oline. For years, Dallas was the elite line. Now it's Philly. It's been plug and play behind those lines. Investing those day 2 picks on the interior line allows you to take a day 3 RB and get day 2 results. 
    • So we have Tremble, JT Sanders, and the Thomas - Franks is the 4th but mainly just for Special teams.  Sanders is a TE - on paper, on the roster, physically, and on the field.  If you are trying to claim because he is a good receiver and not a great blocker he is not a TE then you have not watched very much football, like at all.  Cause that is how a ton of TE's come into the league.  Literally the #1, most common area for improvement for the TE group every single year - especially the top 5 TE's. And for the 1 millionth time, for the people in the back - drafting BPA is absolutely not a rule that anyone follows.  Not a single team.  They always factor in multiple things, BPA being one of them but not the most important almost ever.  It is an evaluation of need, personal evaluation, pick position/who drafts before your next pick, trade offers, free agents possible.  They don't follow it for good reason. Perfect example - Bo Nix.  He was not rated anywhere near #12 by just about anyone - including the broncos.  But they drafted him because they NEEDED a QB, liked him, and had no 2nd RD pick.  They outright said that.  Do you think they regret the pick?  They drafted 100% for need and pick position. Example #2 - Bijan.  Atlanta drafted BPA.  He is amazing, had a great 2 years so far.  They were 7-10 for 2 straight years prior.  And the 2 years after they have been 7-10 & 8-9.  Do you think they made the right decision?  By the way they also spent the #4 overall pick on Pitts, a Generational TE, and he/they suck.  I'd imagine Falcon fans would not agree with your BPA theory since they missed out on Chase, Waddle, Parsons, Horn, PSII, DeVonta Smith - all positions of need in 2021. BPA is A criteria, but not THE criteria.
×
×
  • Create New...