Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade for OL depth?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Not that depth is a issue but the talent level is. After watching us during the preseason no one should be comfortable with this level of play. So as we walk into the best defensive front we have faced all (season and preseason) what are we doing to ease these concerns? Are we gonna just say they will be fine? Because I look at the Patriots whom I don't think their line play has been as bad as ours.

But they have already made 3 offensive lineman trades this week! Nothing top tier but they have been throwing 5-7 draft picks at the problem and scoop potential successors from other teams instead of hoping for cuts. I love an active gm that sees a problem and sets out to correct it. My thing is are we gonna wait till cam gets knocked out another game before we act? Are we just sitting on our hands and ignoring we Have a problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ellis said:

The backup situation at OT ain’t pretty. 

 

Are we even sold on the starters at this point? William's didn't blow me away this preseason... gvr and even pardis looked a little iffy.. hopefully that gets better with time. But I would definitely not bank on it and do nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The value of decent lineman has gone up tremendously. For the most part, teams are hesitant to part with players. That said, the o line is a single unit, not just any player can necessarily come in and improve.

The Dolphins just rejected Clowney and a first for Tunsil, just goes to show how hard it is to pry guys away via trade. Equally as good a bet is find a guy that didn't fit on a team that released him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

Are we even sold on the starters at this point? William's didn't blow me away this preseason... gvr and even pardis looked a little iffy.. hopefully that gets better with time. But I would definitely not bank on it and do nothing.

There's five starters on our line, with maybe seven good knees between them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...