Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Banging the Table For Heinecke

SetfreexX

By SetfreexX,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Wa'ya Newbie

Wa'ya

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, GoPanthers123 said:

Our OL situation requires QB to be durable.  It’s just common sense.  

To be honest the OL actually looked improved tonight, true maybe not top knotch, but a lot better than the last two weeks... and the DL was kicking. DL always jell's quicker than OL so I think we will be fine in the long run... personally I think we shot ourselves in the foot with the relaxed preseason game plans... Sure injury is a worry, but I think groups have to learn how to work together under fire to get good.... Practice isn't the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RumHam Veteran

RumHam

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wa'ya said:

To be honest the OL actually looked improved tonight, true maybe not top knotch, but a lot better than the last two weeks... and the DL was kicking. DL always jell's quicker than OL so I think we will be fine in the long run... personally I think we shot ourselves in the foot with the relaxed preseason game plans... Sure injury is a worry, but I think groups have to learn how to work together under fire to get good.... Practice isn't the same. 

Did the first string start

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wa'ya Newbie

Wa'ya

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I have no idea if you’re being sarcastic or not so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.

No I wasn't being sarcastic. Sure Allen did great against the Saints defence, but the Saint's defence aren't the invincible equation of the Saint's team. Brees operated the Offence and that is were the Saints are dangerous!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wa'ya Newbie

Wa'ya

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Did the first string start

LMAO,,,, No, but to be honest just how much has the first string played this whole preseason? Goes back to what I said. Practice is practice when you go under fire things are different. I think we will be fine over the season. Defence will jive first, and I beleive we have a top 5 Defence.... OL and Offence has the most overall talent we have ever had, they may take some time to jell but they will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Wa'ya said:

No I wasn't being sarcastic. Sure Allen did great against the Saints defence, but the Saint's defence aren't the invincible equation of the Saint's team. Brees operated the Offence and that is were the Saints are dangerous!  

I remember why I don't have football discussions on the huddle anymore.

 

People forget it's a 53 man sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wyank Rookie

Wyank

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Wa'ya said:

No I wasn't being sarcastic. Sure Allen did great against the Saints defence, but the Saint's defence aren't the invincible equation of the Saint's team. Brees operated the Offence and that is were the Saints are dangerous!  

You mean the Brees led offense that scored 12 points against the Panthers 2 weeks before? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Wa'ya said:

I agree Allen is the planned backup no doubt... but out of the three Heinecke has shown the most heart. Kinda sad a draft pick with possible future ability will trump a player who had the misfortune of being knockout with injury his first shot last year. 

Heinecke has been on 3 teams in 4 years and only played in 7 games, 6 of those last year. In those 4 years, he's only put up 363 combined yards. I'm not buying that he's a legit backup. I think he was brought in last year to hold a clipboard and help the Turners install their offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Wa'ya said:

Yeah, but he didn't build it against Brees. I'm sorry but your not playing the Saints unless your playing against Brees

Brees keeps our offense from being able to score? Brees not playing made it easier for Allen to score?

Not sure I've been watching the same game of football as you, but a pretty simple understanding is that QBs play against the defense. They don't play on defense. 

Allen doing ok against the Saints D had nothing to do with Brees not playing.

Winning? Yeah, I'll buy that. Our defense probably wouldn't have looked as good against Brees and we likely wouldn't have won the game. But Brees not playing had no bearing on how our offense did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...