Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Banging the Table For Heinecke


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

I agree Allen is the planned backup no doubt... but out of the three Heinecke has shown the most heart. Kinda sad a draft pick with possible future ability will trump a player who had the misfortune of being knockout with injury his first shot last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Exactly... I dont know how much clearer they could have possibly made it

He hasn't had a great preseason, but he had a decent first series tonight, and hasn't thrown a single interception in a Panthers uniform.  Greer has looked horrible, and Heinicke didn't look much better until the 4qtr tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stbugs said:

@Shocker I’ll take this.

Ok, again since you don’t seem to get things here. We were up 23-0 at halftime and had 4 66-90 yard drives in the first half. So, we had 320 yards of offense in the first half and 118 in the second half. Go here and look at the snap counts. Cam Jordan left the game when we were up 20-0. Most of the starters stayed in for at least the first half.

So again, your BS statement that Allen played against 3rd and 4th stringers was wrong. He built a 23-0 lead against Jordan, Lattimore, Klein, Williams, Bell and the rest of the starting NO D. The best part is that with 53 man rosters and a handful of STs only guys, there aren’t 3rd and 4th stringers. It’s not preseason. SMH.

Yeah, but he didn't build it against Brees. I'm sorry but your not playing the Saints unless your playing against Brees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...