Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your 2019 Carolina Panthers running backs


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

It's time to bring some fresh talent into the fold in the backfield behind CMC. Nick Goings has had more success than Artis-Payne running the football for the Carolina Panthers. At some point you have to raise the bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If McC plays the snaps he did last year and stays healthy it doesn’t even matter who the number 2 is. I don’t agree with that strategy but until we see it change I would assume that’s what we’ll do again. Cam will basically be the number 2 RB....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheRed said:

It's time to bring some fresh talent into the fold in the backfield behind CMC. Nick Goings has had more success than Artis-Payne running the football for the Carolina Panthers. At some point you have to raise the bar.

It may be time to get someone else but honestly CAP has never really been given a chance. It's sad but he has been wasted and I fear the same will be for any back up here. They don't want anyone really running the ball outside of CMC , Moore, or a little Cam. The person will have to be satisfied with 10 carries a yr. I may be stretching it there with 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheRed said:

With a surgically repaired throwing shoulder?

source-18040bcc1a38609ab.gif

My preference would be his only runs are opportunity scrambles and designed runs only in must convert short yard situations, nothing else. But do you really expect anything different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CAP is not a seasoned vet, and Ron has shown little love of what he brings to the table. 

He's had every chance to earn more time in practice, yet still gets hardly any game time.  Nothing about his time here indicates the coaches have any real trust in him.  So, I don't see him making the squad.  And if he isn't clearly a step up from the other guys, it makes no sense to keep a guy who's pretty maxed out over young players with the potential to develop.

Scarlett is clearly making the team, and does everything CAP does, but better.  If CAP brought some unique skillset to the table, maybe, but there's nothing unique about him or his game.  His only chance is that both Holyfield and Bonnafon show nothing, which I don't think is likely.  I expect either or both to show that they are worth keeping as a 3rd back.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

That may well be so but, if he is an NFL beast, that will mean he will become something he never was in the SEC.

Some lesser players actually *do* bloom and are even better at the next level and become something they never were before, so I guess it could happen.

 

This.  Scarlett was mediocre in the SEC and I was pretty shocked he was drafted.  Think he had like 700 yards last year.  Holyfield on the other hand was a beast, played behind Swift yet still ran for over 1,000 while averaging 6.5 yards per carry.  Neither of them did much in terms of receiving.   Report that Holyfield had a good day of practice today and has been the last player to leave every day so far.  Wouldn’t surprise me one bit for him to make the roster.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BrianS said:

I think CAP makes the team only because he's cheap, but long term I hope Scarlett becomes #2.

Oh please, CAP has been a wasted spot of the roster for years! If Holyfield continues his hot start in Red Zone practice to the pre-season there is no way he doesn't make the team. The only way CAP makes the team is if Armah doesn't. CAP is gone, deal with it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...