Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here’s Cowherd before he started hating Cam


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Cowherd bashes Cam because it moves the needle.  Its radio click bait if you will.

Same with hating on Baker Mayfield for no obvious reason. Then getting embarrassed by Baker because he didn't have a real opinion, just a troll opinion.

Trolling is fun in certain instances. Trolling as a way of building a career as a "sports journalist" is fuging pathetic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Cowherd bashes Cam because it moves the needle.  Its radio click bait if you will.

This. To be a radio "personality", you have to have strong opinions or no one will listen to your show. It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong, in fact, the more people that disagree with you the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Greatman77 said:

This. To be a radio "personality", you have to have strong opinions or no one will listen to your show. It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong, in fact, the more people that disagree with you the better.

Its so true. 

Remember a few weeks ago when Cian Fahey put out that QB rankings list and everyone went crazy because he went against the grain?

Cian won that round.  BIGLY!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That's a problem with people. The public needs to be a lot more shrewd about ignoring trolls instead of feeding them.

Trolls is what makes the world around. Without them, there is no Internet, TV, Social Media.. anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

Trolls is what makes the world around. Without them, there is no Internet, TV, Social Media.. anything. 

I remember the internet when trolling was extremely rare. It was actually quite nice.

The world would probably be better without social media. It has done far more harm than good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I remember the internet when trolling was extremely rare. It was actually quite nice.

The world would probably be better without social media. It has done far more harm than good. 

I was not saying this facetiously, just that the internet would prolly not be as profound as it is now, without trolling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He started taking little shots at Cam a couple years ago after he said some Panthers fans got at him on Twitter or stg over stg he said about Cam. He also said fans of small market teams will defend and make more excuses for their guys because "we" don't have as much as fans of larger markets teams. He loves Andrew Luck and for some crazy reason thinks/said that "everyone" hates Luck and loves Cam, smh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

I was not saying this facetiously, just that the internet would prolly not be as profound as it is now, without trolling.  

Eh....I don't know that I agree with that sentiment. The positives of the internet have little to do with trolling. Trolling is a generally accepted norm but I can't say that it is an overall net positive. There is no question it creates a shitload of extremely entertaining content. But I think the internet would be as much if not more profound without the trolling to the extent that it has become. 

Either way, we shouldn't get too far off in the weeds on a non-football discussion. After all, it's training camp time!!!

pizza yes GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...